OBJECTIVES: The authors investigated the risk of bladder cancer in association with exposure to over 12 000 occupational chemical agents, complex mixtures, and other substances (hereafter referred to as chemical agents). METHODS: Adult males diagnosed with cancer between 1983 and 1990 in British Columbia, Canada, were surveyed. Detailed occupational histories and confounding information was provided by a self-administered questionnaire. Cancer controls were matched to bladder cancer cases, resulting in 1062 cases and 8057 controls for the analysis. An extensive United-States-based job-exposure matrix was applied to estimate cumulative exposure to occupational chemical agents. Odds ratios for bladder cancer due to exposure to chemical agents were estimated via conditional logistic regression analyses, adjusted for important confounders. RESULTS: A significantly (P<0.05) increased risk was detected for ever exposure to 635 chemical agents, and 341 chemical agents exhibited a significantly increasing dose-response relationship. Adjustment for multiple comparisons resulted in a subset of 29 chemical agents that continued to show significant results. A principal components analysis classified these 29 chemical agents into five independent groups, distinguished mainly by job. Exposures to these chemical agents were largely due to employment in the logging and construction industries and occupations involving motor vehicles. Consistent results were observed for bladder carcinogens reported in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that several specific chemical agents were significantly associated with the risk of bladder cancer. The chemical agents were mainly derivatives or combustion products of fossil fuels. The results corroborate important findings from the literature and document a risk for specific chemical agents not previously reported.
OBJECTIVES: The authors investigated the risk of bladder cancer in association with exposure to over 12 000 occupational chemical agents, complex mixtures, and other substances (hereafter referred to as chemical agents). METHODS: Adult males diagnosed with cancer between 1983 and 1990 in British Columbia, Canada, were surveyed. Detailed occupational histories and confounding information was provided by a self-administered questionnaire. Cancer controls were matched to bladder cancer cases, resulting in 1062 cases and 8057 controls for the analysis. An extensive United-States-based job-exposure matrix was applied to estimate cumulative exposure to occupational chemical agents. Odds ratios for bladder cancer due to exposure to chemical agents were estimated via conditional logistic regression analyses, adjusted for important confounders. RESULTS: A significantly (P<0.05) increased risk was detected for ever exposure to 635 chemical agents, and 341 chemical agents exhibited a significantly increasing dose-response relationship. Adjustment for multiple comparisons resulted in a subset of 29 chemical agents that continued to show significant results. A principal components analysis classified these 29 chemical agents into five independent groups, distinguished mainly by job. Exposures to these chemical agents were largely due to employment in the logging and construction industries and occupations involving motor vehicles. Consistent results were observed for bladder carcinogens reported in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that several specific chemical agents were significantly associated with the risk of bladder cancer. The chemical agents were mainly derivatives or combustion products of fossil fuels. The results corroborate important findings from the literature and document a risk for specific chemical agents not previously reported.
Authors: Stella Koutros; Manolis Kogevinas; Melissa C Friesen; Patricia A Stewart; Dalsu Baris; Margaret R Karagas; Molly Schwenn; Alison Johnson; G M Monawar Hosain; Consol Serra; Adonina Tardon; Alfredo Carrato; Reina Garcia-Closas; Lee E Moore; Michael L Nickerson; Stephen M Hewitt; Petra Lenz; Alan R Schned; Josep Lloreta; Yves Allory; Haoyu Zhang; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Nathaniel Rothman; Núria Malats; Debra T Silverman Journal: Environ Int Date: 2019-12-18 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Shukrullah Ahmadi; Margot Guth; Astrid Coste; Liacine Bouaoun; Aurélie Danjou; Marie Lefevre; Brigitte Dananché; Delphine Praud; Martie Van Tongeren; Louis Bujan; Olivia Pérol; Joachim Schüz; Barbara Charbotel; Béatrice Fervers; Ann Olsson Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-10-10 Impact factor: 6.575