Literature DB >> 18327185

A Scandinavian tragedy.

D W Jones1.   

Abstract

This paper briefly reviews the logic surrounding the controversial banning of dental amalgam by the Norwegian government. The very small contribution from dentistry to environmental mercury pollution and the significant advantages of amalgam as a dental restorative are emphasised.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2008        PMID： 18327185     DOI： 10.1038/bdj.2008.151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN： 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  3 in total

1.  Reasons for placement of restorations on previously unrestored tooth surfaces by dentists in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Marcelle M Nascimento; Valeria V Gordan; Vibeke Qvist; Mark S Litaker; D Brad Rindal; O D Williams; Jeffrey L Fellows; Lloyd K Ritchie; Ivar A Mjör; Jocelyn McClelland; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.634

2.  Biocompatibility of dental amalgams.

Authors:  Yurdanur Uçar; William A Brantley
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2011-11-23

3.  Dental amalgam and urinary mercury concentrations: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Alexandra Nicolae; Harry Ames; Carlos Quiñonez
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 2.757
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.