OBJECTIVE: Cost-effectiveness of hypertension treatment is an important social and medical issue in Western as well as in Eastern countries, including Japan. Home blood pressure (HBP) measurements have a stronger predictive power for cardiovascular events than casual clinic blood pressure (CBP) measurements. Therefore, the introduction of HBP measurement for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension should lead to a decrease in medical expenditure. This study presents calculations of the cost savings likely to take place when HBP is implemented for newly detected hypertensive subjects in Japan. DESIGN AND METHODS: We estimate the cost savings from the perspective of a Japanese healthcare system. To estimate the costs associated with changing from CBP to HBP measurement as the diagnostic tool, we constructed a simulation model using data from the Ohasama study. These calculations are based on current estimates for cost of treatment, prevalence of white-coat hypertension at baseline, and varying the incidence of new hypertension after the initial screening. RESULTS: When HBP measurement is not incorporated into the diagnostic process, the medical cost is estimated at US$10.89 million per 1000 subjects per 5 years. When HBP measurement is incorporated, the medical cost is estimated at US$9.33 million per 1000 subjects per 5 years. The reductions in medical costs vary from US$674,000 to US$2.51 million per 1000 subjects per 5 years for treatment of hypertension, when sensitivity analysis is performed. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of HBP measurement for the treatment of hypertension is very useful for reducing medical costs.
OBJECTIVE: Cost-effectiveness of hypertension treatment is an important social and medical issue in Western as well as in Eastern countries, including Japan. Home blood pressure (HBP) measurements have a stronger predictive power for cardiovascular events than casual clinic blood pressure (CBP) measurements. Therefore, the introduction of HBP measurement for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension should lead to a decrease in medical expenditure. This study presents calculations of the cost savings likely to take place when HBP is implemented for newly detected hypertensive subjects in Japan. DESIGN AND METHODS: We estimate the cost savings from the perspective of a Japanese healthcare system. To estimate the costs associated with changing from CBP to HBP measurement as the diagnostic tool, we constructed a simulation model using data from the Ohasama study. These calculations are based on current estimates for cost of treatment, prevalence of white-coat hypertension at baseline, and varying the incidence of new hypertension after the initial screening. RESULTS: When HBP measurement is not incorporated into the diagnostic process, the medical cost is estimated at US$10.89 million per 1000 subjects per 5 years. When HBP measurement is incorporated, the medical cost is estimated at US$9.33 million per 1000 subjects per 5 years. The reductions in medical costs vary from US$674,000 to US$2.51 million per 1000 subjects per 5 years for treatment of hypertension, when sensitivity analysis is performed. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of HBP measurement for the treatment of hypertension is very useful for reducing medical costs.
Authors: Verughese Jacob; Sajal K Chattopadhyay; Krista K Proia; David P Hopkins; Jeffrey Reynolds; Anilkrishna B Thota; Christopher D Jones; Daniel T Lackland; Kimberly J Rask; Nicolaas P Pronk; John M Clymer; Ron Z Goetzel Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2017-08-14 Impact factor: 5.043