Literature DB >> 18327066

Antihypertensive medication and their impact on cancer incidence: a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Craig I Coleman1, William L Baker, Jeffrey Kluger, C Michael White.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to determine the association between commonly used antihypertensive agents and the incidence of cancer.
METHODS: We conducted a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis of randomized, controlled (placebo, active, or untreated control) trials of antihypertensive drugs. A systematic literature search was conducted through June 2007. The primary outcome measure assessed was the incidence of cancer. Mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis was used to combine direct, within-trial, and between-drug comparisons with indirect evidence from the other trials. The indirect comparisons, which safeguard within-trial randomized findings, were constructed from trials with one treatment in common. Results are reported as odds ratios with 95% credible intervals.
RESULTS: In total, 27 studies (56 treatment arms, 126137 patients enrolled, and 5868 cancers identified during follow-up) were included in the base-case analysis. They were hypertension, prehypertension, heart failure, coronary artery disease, or renal disease trials and patients were randomized to one of the five major antihypertensive drug classes or to placebo/untreated control. With the placebo/untreated control group as the referent comparison, the odds for developing cancer were 0.99 (0.80-1.24) for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; 1.12 (0.87-1.47) for angiotensin receptor blockers; 1.00 (0.78-1.32) for beta-adrenergic blockers; 0.94 (0.73-1.19) for diuretics and 0.95 (0.79-1.13) for calcium channel blockers. In sensitivity analyses, the results were not altered to any noteworthy extent including exclusion of studies under 3 years duration.
CONCLUSION: Based on the totality of the clinical trial literature, commonly used antihypertensive drugs are not associated with increased odds of developing cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18327066     DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282f3ef5e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  24 in total

Review 1.  Angiotensin receptor blockers and tumorigenesis: something to be (or not to be) concerned about?

Authors:  Vadim Tchaikovski; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Angiotensin receptor blockers and the risk of malignancy: a note of caution.

Authors:  Domenic A Sica
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Angiotensin-receptor blockade and risk of cancer: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Ilke Sipahi; Sara M Debanne; Douglas Y Rowland; Daniel I Simon; James C Fang
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 4.  Screening pharmaceuticals for possible carcinogenic effects: initial positive results for drugs not previously screened.

Authors:  Gary D Friedman; Natalia Udaltsova; James Chan; Charles P Quesenberry; Laurel A Habel
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Borrowing of strength from indirect evidence in 40 network meta-analyses.

Authors:  Lifeng Lin; Aiwen Xing; Michael J Kofler; Mohammad Hassan Murad
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 6.  Drug development: how academia, industry and authorities interact.

Authors:  Silvio Garattini; Norberto Perico
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 7.  Potential increased risk of cancer from commonly used medications: an umbrella review of meta-analyses.

Authors:  J P A Ioannidis; Y Zhou; C Q Chang; S D Schully; M J Khoury; A N Freedman
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Does β-adrenoceptor blocker therapy improve cancer survival? Findings from a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sunil M Shah; Iain M Carey; Christopher G Owen; Tess Harris; Stephen Dewilde; Derek G Cook
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Inhibition of renin-angiotensin system affects prognosis of advanced pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine.

Authors:  Y Nakai; H Isayama; H Ijichi; T Sasaki; N Sasahira; K Hirano; H Kogure; K Kawakubo; H Yagioka; Y Yashima; S Mizuno; K Yamamoto; T Arizumi; O Togawa; S Matsubara; T Tsujino; K Tateishi; M Tada; M Omata; K Koike
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Additive interaction between the renin-angiotensin system and lipid metabolism for cancer in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Xilin Yang; Hailu Zhao; Yi Sui; Ronald C W Ma; Wing Yee So; Gary T C Ko; Alice P S Kong; Risa Ozaki; Chun Yip Yeung; Gang Xu; Peter C Y Tong; Juliana C N Chan
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 9.461

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.