Literature DB >> 18327015

Executive functions in pathologic gamblers selected in an ecologic setting.

María Roca1, Teresa Torralva, Pablo López, Marcelo Cetkovich, Luke Clark, Facundo Manes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have reported deficits in measures of decision making in pathologic gamblers (PGs) suggesting an involvement of the prefrontal cortex in the pathophysiology of this disorder. As only 7% to 12% of PGs are thought to seek treatment, most of the studies have relied on few specifically selected groups of PGs recruited from psychiatric units who were undergoing or seeking treatment and therefore their results are poorly representative of the general PG population.
METHODS: The present study compared decision making and executive functions among 11 PGs who were selected from an ecologic setting and 11 healthy controls.
RESULTS: The PG group selected fewer advantageous cards on a decision-making task, the Iowa Gambling Task, and made more commission errors on the Go-No Go task, a test of inhibitory control, compared with controls.
CONCLUSIONS: The impairments in decision making are similar to those previously reported in individuals with prefrontal lesions and treatment-seeking PGs. PGs also presented impairment in tasks of inhibitory control suggesting an involvement of the prefrontal cortex in the pathophysiology of pathologic gambling (PG). The deficits in decision making and inhibition of irrelevant information observed in this study may have distinct but additive effects upon the development of PG behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18327015     DOI: 10.1097/WNN.0b013e3181684358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol        ISSN: 1543-3633            Impact factor:   1.600


  31 in total

1.  Neural correlates of pathological gamblers preference for immediate rewards during the iowa gambling task: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Yuri Power; Bradley Goodyear; David Crockford
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2012-12

2.  Impaired self-awareness in pathological gamblers.

Authors:  Damien Brevers; Axel Cleeremans; Antoine Bechara; Max Greisen; Charles Kornreich; Paul Verbanck; Xavier Noël
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2013-03

Review 3.  Are executive function and impulsivity antipodes? A conceptual reconstruction with special reference to addiction.

Authors:  Warren K Bickel; David P Jarmolowicz; E Terry Mueller; Kirstin M Gatchalian; Samuel M McClure
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Affective and cognitive correlates of gambling behavior in university students.

Authors:  Antonio Pascual-Leone; Kevin Gomes; Emily S Orr; Kristen A Kaploun; Christopher A Abeare
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2011-09

Review 5.  Decision-making during gambling: an integration of cognitive and psychobiological approaches.

Authors:  Luke Clark
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Impaired Decision Making is Associated with Poor Inhibition Control in Nonpathological Lottery Gamblers.

Authors:  Xiaolong Hong; Lili Zheng; Xianchun Li
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2015-12

7.  Reduced cortical thickness in gambling disorder: a morphometric MRI study.

Authors:  Jon E Grant; Brian L Odlaug; Samuel R Chamberlain
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 5.270

8.  Abnormalities of striatal morphology in gambling disorder and at-risk gambling.

Authors:  Jon E Grant; Masanori Isobe; Samuel R Chamberlain
Journal:  CNS Spectr       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.790

9.  The Iowa Gambling Task in fMRI images.

Authors:  Xiangrui Li; Zhong-Lin Lu; Arnaud D'Argembeau; Marie Ng; Antoine Bechara
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Problem gamblers share deficits in impulsive decision-making with alcohol-dependent individuals.

Authors:  Andrew J Lawrence; Jason Luty; Nadine A Bogdan; Barbara J Sahakian; Luke Clark
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.