Literature DB >> 18326890

Motor cortical disinhibition during early and late recovery after stroke.

P Manganotti1, M Acler, G P Zanette, N Smania, A Fiaschi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Functional neuroimaging studies show adaptive changes in areas adjacent and distant from the stroke. This longitudinal study assessed whether changes in cortical excitability in affected and unaffected motor areas after acute stroke correlates with functional and motor recovery.
METHODS: We studied 13 patients with moderate to severe hemiparesis 5 to 7 days (T1), 30 days (T2), and 90 days (T3) after acute unilateral stroke, as well as 10 healthy controls. We used paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation to study intracortical inhibition and facilitation, recording from the bilateral thenar eminences. F waves were also recorded.
RESULTS: At T1, all patients showed significantly reduced intracortical inhibition in the unaffected hemisphere. At T2, in patients whose motor function recovered, intracortical inhibition in the unaffected hemisphere returned to normal. In patients with poor clinical motor recovery, abnormal disinhibition persisted in both hemispheres. At T3, in patients whose motor function progressively recovered, the abnormal disinhibition in the unaffected hemisphere decreased further, whereas in patients whose motor function remained poor, abnormal inhibition in the unaffected hemisphere persisted. No modification of F-wave latency and amplitude were found in patients and controls.
CONCLUSIONS: During early days after stroke, motor cortical disinhibition involves both cerebral hemispheres. Longitudinal changes in motor disinhibition of the unaffected hemisphere may reflect the degree of clinical motor recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18326890     DOI: 10.1177/1545968307313505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  41 in total

1.  A new measure of cortical inhibition by mechanomyography and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation in unanesthetized rats.

Authors:  Tsung-Hsun Hsieh; Sameer C Dhamne; Jia-Jin J Chen; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Frances E Jensen; Alexander Rotenberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Characterizing differential poststroke corticomotor drive to the dorsi- and plantarflexor muscles during resting and volitional muscle activation.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Palmer; Ryan Zarzycki; Susanne M Morton; Trisha M Kesar; Stuart A Binder-Macleod
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Motor compensation and its effects on neural reorganization after stroke.

Authors:  Theresa A Jones
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Importance and Difficulties of Pursuing rTMS Research in Acute Stroke.

Authors:  James R Carey; Diane M Chappuis; Marsha J Finkelstein; Kate L Frost; Lynette K Leuty; Allison L McNulty; Lars I E Oddsson; Erin M Seifert; Teresa J Kimberley
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2017-03-01

5.  Interhemispheric somatosensory differences in chronic pain reflect abnormality of the healthy side.

Authors:  Flavia Di Pietro; Tasha R Stanton; G Lorimer Moseley; Martin Lotze; James H McAuley
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Fluoxetine Maintains a State of Heightened Responsiveness to Motor Training Early After Stroke in a Mouse Model.

Authors:  Kwan L Ng; Ellen M Gibson; Robert Hubbard; Juemin Yang; Brian Caffo; Richard J O'Brien; John W Krakauer; Steven R Zeiler
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  The neurophysiological effects of single-dose theophylline in patients with chronic stroke: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized cross-over study.

Authors:  Heidi M Schambra; Isis E Martinez-Hernandez; Kevin J Slane; Amelia K Boehme; Randolph S Marshall; Ronald M Lazar
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 8.  Biomarkers of recovery after stroke.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Milot; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.710

Review 9.  Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the understanding of functional recovery mechanisms after stroke.

Authors:  Michael A Dimyan; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 3.919

10.  Transmission in heteronymous spinal pathways is modified after stroke and related to motor incoordination.

Authors:  Joseph-Omer Dyer; Eric Maupas; Sibele de Andrade Melo; Daniel Bourbonnais; Jean Fleury; Robert Forget
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.