PURPOSE: To report the characteristics of confocal blue reflectance imaging in type 2 idiopathic macular telangiectasia (type 2 IMT). METHODS: In a prospective observational cross-sectional study, both eyes of 33 patients with type 2 IMT were examined by means of fundus biomicroscopy, fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Confocal blue reflectance (CBR) imaging was performed using a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (HRA2; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). To compare the results derived from different imaging modalities, an analysis was performed using image analysis software (Heidelberg Eye Explorer; Heidelberg Engineering). RESULTS: CBR imaging revealed a parafoveal area of increased reflectance that was slightly larger than the area of hyperfluorescence in late-phase fluorescein angiography. The area usually encompassed an oval parafoveal area, but sectors could be spared. A parafoveal area of increased CBR was detected in 98% of eyes that showed angiographic evidence for type 2 IMT. CONCLUSIONS: CBR imaging is a new, noninvasive, and sensitive method that may contribute to differentiate type 2 IMT from other diseases. Abnormalities of macular pigment distribution and Müller cell pathology may contribute to the phenomenon of increased CBR and thus the pathophysiology of type 2 IMT.
PURPOSE: To report the characteristics of confocal blue reflectance imaging in type 2 idiopathic macular telangiectasia (type 2 IMT). METHODS: In a prospective observational cross-sectional study, both eyes of 33 patients with type 2 IMT were examined by means of fundus biomicroscopy, fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Confocal blue reflectance (CBR) imaging was performed using a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (HRA2; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). To compare the results derived from different imaging modalities, an analysis was performed using image analysis software (Heidelberg Eye Explorer; Heidelberg Engineering). RESULTS: CBR imaging revealed a parafoveal area of increased reflectance that was slightly larger than the area of hyperfluorescence in late-phase fluorescein angiography. The area usually encompassed an oval parafoveal area, but sectors could be spared. A parafoveal area of increased CBR was detected in 98% of eyes that showed angiographic evidence for type 2 IMT. CONCLUSIONS: CBR imaging is a new, noninvasive, and sensitive method that may contribute to differentiate type 2 IMT from other diseases. Abnormalities of macular pigment distribution and Müller cell pathology may contribute to the phenomenon of increased CBR and thus the pathophysiology of type 2 IMT.
Authors: Daniel Pauleikhoff; Roberto Bonelli; Adam M Dubis; Frederic Gunnemann; Kai Rothaus; Peter Charbel Issa; Tjebo Fc Heeren; Tunde Peto; Traci E Clemons; Emily Y Chew; Alan C Bird; Ferenc B Sallo Journal: Acta Ophthalmol Date: 2019-04-09 Impact factor: 3.761
Authors: Michael B Powner; Mark C Gillies; Marina Tretiach; Andrew Scott; Robyn H Guymer; Gregory S Hageman; Marcus Fruttiger Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2010-08-03 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Tunde Peto; Tjebo F C Heeren; Traci E Clemons; Ferenc B Sallo; Irene Leung; Emily Y Chew; Alan C Bird Journal: Retina Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Ferenc B Sallo; Tunde Peto; Catherine Egan; Ute E K Wolf-Schnurrbusch; Traci E Clemons; Mark C Gillies; Daniel Pauleikhoff; Gary S Rubin; Emily Y Chew; Alan C Bird Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-11-29 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Wai T Wong; Farzin Forooghian; Zigurts Majumdar; Robert F Bonner; Denise Cunningham; Emily Y Chew Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2009-07-02 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Peter Charbel Issa; Mark C Gillies; Emily Y Chew; Alan C Bird; Tjebo F C Heeren; Tunde Peto; Frank G Holz; Hendrik P N Scholl Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2012-12-03 Impact factor: 21.198