Literature DB >> 18325713

Venous ultrasound testing for suspected thrombosis: incidence of significant non-thrombotic findings.

Mark E Sutter1, Samuel D Turnipseed, Deborah B Diercks, Peter Samuel, Richard H White.   

Abstract

Duplex ultrasound (US) is used to "rule out" deep venous thrombosis (DVT), but can also diagnose other causes of leg pain or swelling in Emergency Department (ED) patients. Recent literature suggests that US imaging is unnecessary among patients with low or moderate clinical probability of DVT with a normal D-dimer. We attempted to determine the incidence of clinically important incidental findings detected using venous US imaging in patients with suspected lower extremity DVT. We conducted a retrospective chart review of all ultrasounds performed by the non-invasive vascular laboratory on ED patients > 18 years old. Results were classified: normal, DVT, or incidental finding. The latter were classified as clinically significant major findings if the diagnosis led to immediate and specific treatment to prevent morbidity, or clinically significant minor findings. A total of 484 US studies were reviewed; 179 were excluded (arterial studies, penetrating trauma, upper extremity US). Findings among 305 studies were: 238 (78%) normal, 28 (9%) DVT, and 39 (12%) incidental findings. Among 39 incidental findings, 10 were clinically significant major findings and 29 clinically significant minor findings. Clinically significant major findings included: pseudoaneurysm, arterial occlusive disease, vascular graft complication, compartment syndrome, and tumor. Among 38 abnormal US studies that required immediate treatment, DVT comprised 74% (95% confidence interval 59%-85%) and important major incidental findings 26% (95% confidence interval 14%-41%). Among ED patients who underwent US to evaluate leg pain and swelling, 26% of positive studies showed clinically important findings other than DVT. Further research is needed to determine if D-dimer plus a clinical probability tool will include or exclude the patients with clinically significant major findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18325713     DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.08.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0736-4679            Impact factor:   1.484


  4 in total

Review 1.  [Diagnostic workup and therapy of acute venous diseases].

Authors:  T Silber; K Schweinzer; A Strölin
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 2.  Biochemical markers for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism: the past, present and future.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Gianfranco Cervellin; Massimo Franchini; Emmanuel J Favaloro
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Non-thrombotic abnormalities on lower extremity venous duplex ultrasound examinations.

Authors:  Srikar Adhikari; Wes Zeger
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-03-02

4.  Prevalence and predictors of alternative diagnoses on whole-leg ultrasound negative for acute deep venous thrombosis.

Authors:  Ebba Beller; Mattes Becher; Felix G Meinel; Jens-Christian Kröger; Rengarajan Rajagopal; Raimund Höft; Marc-André Weber; Thomas Heller
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 1.930

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.