Literature DB >> 18324950

How to use linear regression and correlation in quantitative method comparison studies.

P J Twomey1, M H Kroll.   

Abstract

Linear regression methods try to determine the best linear relationship between data points while correlation coefficients assess the association (as opposed to agreement) between the two methods. Linear regression and correlation play an important part in the interpretation of quantitative method comparison studies. Their major strength is that they are widely known and as a result both are employed in the vast majority of method comparison studies. While previously performed by hand, the availability of statistical packages means that regression analysis is usually performed by software packages including MS Excel, with or without the software programe Analyze-it as well as by other software packages. Such techniques need to be employed in a way that compares the agreement between the two methods examined and more importantly, because we are dealing with individual patients, whether the degree of agreement is clinically acceptable. Despite their use for many years, there is a lot of ignorance about the validity as well as the pros and cons of linear regression and correlation techniques. This review article describes the types of linear regression and regression (parametric and non-parametric methods) and the necessary general and specific requirements. The selection of the type of regression depends on where one has been trained, the tradition of the laboratory and the availability of adequate software.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18324950     DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01709.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pract        ISSN: 1368-5031            Impact factor:   2.503


  4 in total

1.  Assessment of a dried blood spot C-reactive protein method to identify disease flares in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Authors:  Leon G D'Cruz; Kevin G McEleney; Chris Cochrane; Kyle B C Tan; Priyank Shukla; Philip V Gardiner; Dawn Small; Shu-Dong Zhang; David S Gibson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Derivation and internal validation of an equation for albumin-adjusted calcium.

Authors:  Matthew T James; Jianguo Zhang; Andrew W Lyon; Brenda R Hemmelgarn
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2008-11-27

3.  Effects of GSTT1 Genotype on the Detoxification of 1,3-Butadiene Derived Diepoxide and Formation of Promutagenic DNA-DNA Cross-Links in Human Hapmap Cell Lines.

Authors:  Gunnar Boysen; Rashi Arora; Amanda Degner; Karin R Vevang; Christopher Chao; Freddys Rodriguez; Scott J Walmsley; Luke Erber; Natalia Y Tretyakova; Lisa A Peterson
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  Comparison of central venous saturation by standard ABG machine versus co-oximeter: Is 18 carat as good as the 24 carat gold standard?

Authors:  Gayathri Subramanian; V P Anitha; Suchitra Ranjit
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.