Literature DB >> 18324902

Analgesia during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: fentanyl citrate versus parecoxib sodium.

Iraklis C Mitsogiannis1, Theodore Anagnostou, Vassilios Tzortzis, Anastasios Karatzas, Stavros Gravas, Vassilis Poulakis, Michael D Melekos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Shockwave-induced pain may become an important issue during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), although the new generation of lithotriptors generally produces less pain than previous models. The aim of the study was to compare the analgesic effect of a cyclooxygenase-2-specific inhibitor (parecoxib sodium) with that of our standard method of analgesia (fentanyl citrate) in patients who needed pain relief when undergoing SWL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients who were undergoing SWL for renal calculi were randomized to receive intravenously either fentanyl citrate (group A, n = 30) or parecoxib sodium (group B, n = 28) when they felt that their pain during the session became intolerable. Lithotripsy was recommenced 10 minutes after administration of analgesia. The severity of pain before and after administration of the analgesic regimens was evaluated using a five-level verbal scale. The effectiveness of each drug was evaluated with respect to degree of pain relief and ensuing tolerance of the procedure to completion, as well as the need for supplementary analgesia (half the standard dose of fentanyl citrate).
RESULTS: The patients in the two groups were comparable with regard to age, sex, body mass index, and stone size. There was no statistically significant difference in the maximum energy level achieved as well as in the total number of shock waves given in the two groups. Administration of fentanyl citrate resulted in alleviation of pain and completion of SWL in 27 patients (90%), whereas parecoxib sodium was effective in five patients (17.8%) (P < 0.01). The remaining 23 patients in group B received supplementary analgesia, and 22 completed the lithotripsy session.
CONCLUSIONS: Parecoxib sodium was not as effective as fentanyl citrate in alleviating pain during SWL. Its use, however, may lower the dose of opioid-based analgesia in this group of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18324902     DOI: 10.1089/end.2007.0344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  4 in total

1.  Feasibility and efficacy of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy using a new modified lateral position for the treatment of renal stones in obese patients.

Authors:  Anastasios Karatzas; Stavros Gravas; Vassilios Tzortzis; Evangelos Aravantinos; Ioannis Zachos; Nikolaos Kalogeras; Michael Melekos
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-08-17

2.  Comparison between two shock wave regimens using frequencies of 60 and 90 impulses per minute for urinary stones.

Authors:  Eduardo Mazzucchi; Artur H Brito; Alexandre Danilovic; Gustavo X Ebaid; Elias Chedid Neto; José Reinaldo Franco de Azevedo; Miguel Srougi
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.365

3.  Drugs for pain management in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Christian Bach; Faruquz Zaman; Stefanos Kachrilas; Priyadarshi Kumar; Noor Buchholz; Junaid Masood
Journal:  Pain Res Treat       Date:  2011-11-03

Review 4.  Analgesia for patients undergoing shockwave lithotripsy for urinary stones - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Omar M Aboumarzouk; Rami Hasan; Ali Tasleem; Martin Mariappan; Rachael Hutton; John Fitzpatrick; Laura Beatty; Gareth E Jones; Tarik Amer
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.