Literature DB >> 18324444

Tumor-positive sentinel node biopsy of the groin in clinically node-negative melanoma patients: superficial or superficial and deep lymph node dissection?

Iris M C van der Ploeg1, Renato A Valdés Olmos, Bin B R Kroon, Omgo E Nieweg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The extent of a completion groin dissection in sentinel node-positive melanoma patients was guided by the location of the second-echelon nodes on the preoperative lymphoscintigram. The purposes of the current study were to investigate the pathological findings, the lymph node recurrences and (disease-free) survival associated with this approach.
METHODS: Between June 1996 and April 2007, 42 patients underwent completion groin dissection after a tumor-positive sentinel node biopsy. Eighteen patients had femoro-inguinal second-echelon nodes on their lymphoscintigram and underwent a superficial lymph node dissection. Twenty-four patients had iliac-obturator second-echelon nodes found by scan and underwent a combined superficial and deep dissection.
RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 61 months. One of the 18 patients who underwent a superficial groin dissection developed a deep (obturator) lymph node recurrence after 12 months. Revision of the lymphoscintigram showed that the images had been interpreted incorrectly and that the second-echelon node was located in the obturator area after all. A combined superficial and deep dissection revealed additional involved nodes in the deep lymph node compartment in 2 of the 24 patients. At 5 years, 77% of all patients were alive, and 56% were alive and free of disease. These figures were 76% and 53%, respectively, in the patients who underwent superficial dissection only, and 80% and 61%, respectively, in the patients who also underwent deep dissection.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that a strategy to determine the extent of the groin dissection that is based on the location of the second-tier nodes may be valid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18324444     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-008-9840-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  4 in total

1.  EANM-EORTC general recommendations for sentinel node diagnostics in melanoma.

Authors:  Annette H Chakera; Birger Hesse; Zeynep Burak; James R Ballinger; Allan Britten; Corrado Caracò; Alistair J Cochran; Martin G Cook; Krzysztof T Drzewiecki; Richard Essner; Einat Even-Sapir; Alexander M M Eggermont; Tanja Gmeiner Stopar; Christian Ingvar; Martin C Mihm; Stanley W McCarthy; Nicola Mozzillo; Omgo E Nieweg; Richard A Scolyer; Hans Starz; John F Thompson; Giuseppe Trifirò; Giuseppe Viale; Sergi Vidal-Sicart; Roger Uren; Wendy Waddington; Arturo Chiti; Alain Spatz; Alessandro Testori
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Regional control and morbidity after superficial groin dissection in melanoma.

Authors:  Amber L Shada; Craig L Slingluff
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Inguinopelvic lymphadenectomy following positive inguinal sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma: true frequency of synchronous pelvic metastases.

Authors:  Carrie K Chu; Keith A Delman; Grant W Carlson; Andrea C Hestley; Douglas R Murray
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Optimal extent of completion lymphadenectomy for patients with melanoma and a positive sentinel node in the groin.

Authors:  D Verver; M F Madu; C M C Oude Ophuis; M Faut; J H W de Wilt; J J Bonenkamp; D J Grünhagen; A C J van Akkooi; C Verhoef; B L van Leeuwen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 6.939

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.