Literature DB >> 18324317

Trying to resolve a dispute over the best way to diagnose cervical neoplasia in a developing country.

Lynne Gaffikin, Harshad Sanghvi, Ricky Lu, Paul D Blumenthal.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2008        PMID： 18324317      PMCID： PMC2258473     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medscape J Med        ISSN： 1934-1997


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  Effect of visual screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Tamil Nadu, India: a cluster-randomised trial.

Authors:  Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan; Pulikkottil Okkuru Esmy; Rajamanickam Rajkumar; Richard Muwonge; Rajaraman Swaminathan; Sivanandam Shanthakumari; Jean-Marie Fayette; Jacob Cherian
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-08-04       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Cervical screening by visual inspection with acetic acid.

Authors:  Anne Szarewski
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-08-04       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Assessing the gain in diagnostic performance when two visual inspection methods are combined for cervical cancer prevention.

Authors:  Richard Muwonge; Stephen D Walter; Ramani S Wesley; Partha Basu; Surendra S Shastri; Somanathan Thara; Charles Gombe Mbalawa; Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.136

4.  Cost-effectiveness of cervical-cancer screening in five developing countries.

Authors:  Sue J Goldie; Lynne Gaffikin; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Amparo Gordillo-Tobar; Carol Levin; Cédric Mahé; Thomas C Wright
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical-cancer screening: test qualities in a primary-care setting. University of Zimbabwe/JHPIEGO Cervical Cancer Project.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-03-13       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Examination of the cervix with the naked eye using acetic acid test.

Authors:  M Ottaviano; P La Torre
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-05-15       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Screen-and-treat approaches for cervical cancer prevention in low-resource settings: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lynette Denny; Louise Kuhn; Michelle De Souza; Amy E Pollack; William Dupree; Thomas C Wright
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Safety, acceptability, and feasibility of a single-visit approach to cervical-cancer prevention in rural Thailand: a demonstration project.

Authors:  L Gaffikin; P D Blumenthal; M Emerson; K Limpaphayom
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-03-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Performance of visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical cancer screening: a qualitative summary of evidence to date.

Authors:  Lynne Gaffikin; Margo Lauterbach; Paul D Blumenthal
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.347

10.  Costs and benefits of different strategies to screen for cervical cancer in less-developed countries.

Authors:  Jeanne S Mandelblatt; William F Lawrence; Lynne Gaffikin; Khunying Kobchitt Limpahayom; Pisake Lumbiganon; Suwanna Warakamin; Jason King; Bin Yi; Patricia Ringers; Paul D Blumenthal
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-10-02       Impact factor: 13.506
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.