OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient-provider agreement on whether weight and related behaviors were discussed during routine visits. DESIGN: Post-visit survey assessments of patients and providers. PARTICIPANTS: Obese patients make up the majority of all patients seen in primary care (PC). The patients and physicians were recruited at the time of PC visits. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Percent patient-physician agreement and patient, provider and practice characteristics associated with agreement. Patients (456) and physicians (30) agreed about whether or not they discussed weight, physical activity (PA), and diet for 61% of office visits. There was disagreement on one of the items (weight, PA, or diet) for 23% of office visits, and for 2 or more of the items for 16% of the visits. Agreement was relatively greater for discussing weight than for discussing diet or physical activity. Physicians reported discussing weight issues more often than did patients. Overall patient-physician agreement was 0.51-0.59 (weighted Kappa statistic). In a multivariate analyses of factors associated with patient-physician agreement, health insurance (odds ratio [OR]=3.67, p value = 0.002), physician description of patient weight status (OR = 2.27, p value = 0.002), patient report of how weight relates to health (OR = 1.70, p value = 0.04), and female patient gender (OR = 1.62, p = value = 0.02) were significantly related to agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and providers disagreed about whether or not weight issues were discussed in a large number of primary care encounters in this study. Physicians may be able to improve care for their obese patients by focusing discussions on specific details of diet and physical activity behaviors, and by clarifying that patients perceive weight-related information has been shared.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient-provider agreement on whether weight and related behaviors were discussed during routine visits. DESIGN: Post-visit survey assessments of patients and providers. PARTICIPANTS: Obesepatients make up the majority of all patients seen in primary care (PC). The patients and physicians were recruited at the time of PC visits. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Percent patient-physician agreement and patient, provider and practice characteristics associated with agreement. Patients (456) and physicians (30) agreed about whether or not they discussed weight, physical activity (PA), and diet for 61% of office visits. There was disagreement on one of the items (weight, PA, or diet) for 23% of office visits, and for 2 or more of the items for 16% of the visits. Agreement was relatively greater for discussing weight than for discussing diet or physical activity. Physicians reported discussing weight issues more often than did patients. Overall patient-physician agreement was 0.51-0.59 (weighted Kappa statistic). In a multivariate analyses of factors associated with patient-physician agreement, health insurance (odds ratio [OR]=3.67, p value = 0.002), physician description of patient weight status (OR = 2.27, p value = 0.002), patient report of how weight relates to health (OR = 1.70, p value = 0.04), and female patient gender (OR = 1.62, p = value = 0.02) were significantly related to agreement. CONCLUSIONS:Patients and providers disagreed about whether or not weight issues were discussed in a large number of primary care encounters in this study. Physicians may be able to improve care for their obesepatients by focusing discussions on specific details of diet and physical activity behaviors, and by clarifying that patients perceive weight-related information has been shared.
Authors: Andrea Charbonneau Ely; K Allen Greiner; Wendi Born; Sandra Hall; Paula C Rhode; Aimee S James; Nicole Nollen; Jasjit S Ahluwalia Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2006 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Lijing L Yan; Martha L Daviglus; Kiang Liu; Jeremiah Stamler; Renwei Wang; Amber Pirzada; Daniel B Garside; Alan R Dyer; Linda Van Horn; Youlian Liao; James F Fries; Philip Greenland Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-01-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Anna Peeters; Jan J Barendregt; Frans Willekens; Johan P Mackenbach; Abdullah Al Mamun; Luc Bonneux Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2003-01-07 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Arch G Mainous; Donna Kern; Berry Hainer; Rayna Kneuper-Hall; Julie Stephens; Mark E Geesey Journal: Fam Med Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 1.756
Authors: Cathy L Melvin; Melanie S Jefferson; LaShanta J Rice; Lynne S Nemeth; Andrea M Wessell; Paul J Nietert; Chanita Hughes-Halbert Journal: Prev Med Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Linda Y Kim; Danielle E Rose; Lynn M Soban; Susan E Stockdale; Lisa S Meredith; Samuel T Edwards; Christian D Helfrich; Lisa V Rubenstein Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-09-25 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Afton M Koball; Paul S Mueller; Julia Craner; Matthew M Clark; Sanjeev Nanda; Esayas B Kebede; Karen B Grothe Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2016-07-29 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: A Taylor Kelley; Susan D Goold; John Z Ayanian; Minal Patel; Eunice Zhang; Erin Beathard; Tammy Chang; Erica Solway; Renuka Tipirneni Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Sophie Lewis; Samantha L Thomas; R Warwick Blood; Jim Hyde; David J Castle; Paul A Komesaroff Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2010-02-03 Impact factor: 3.390