Literature DB >> 18322089

Dopamine receptor activation is required for corticostriatal spike-timing-dependent plasticity.

Verena Pawlak1, Jason N D Kerr.   

Abstract

Single action potentials (APs) backpropagate into the higher-order dendrites of striatal spiny projection neurons during cortically driven "up" states. The timing of these backpropagating APs relative to the arriving corticostriatal excitatory inputs determines changes in dendritic calcium concentration. The question arises to whether this spike-timing relative to cortical excitatory inputs can also induce synaptic plasticity at corticostriatal synapses. Here we show that timing of single postsynaptic APs relative to the cortically evoked EPSP determines both the direction and the strength of synaptic plasticity in spiny projection neurons. Single APs occurring 30 ms before the cortically evoked EPSP induced long-term depression (LTD), whereas APs occurring 10 ms after the EPSP induced long-term potentiation (LTP). The amount of plasticity decreased as the time between the APs and EPSPs was increased, with the resulting spike-timing window being broader for LTD than for LTP. In addition, we show that dopamine receptor activation is required for this spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP). Blocking dopamine D(1)/D(5) receptors prevented both LTD and LTP induction. In contrast, blocking dopamine D(2) receptors delayed, but did not prevent, LTD and sped induction of LTP. We conclude (1) that, in combination with cortical inputs, single APs evoked in spiny projection neurons can induce both LTP and LTD of the corticostriatal pathway; (2) that the strength and direction of these synaptic changes depend deterministically on the AP timing relative to the arriving cortical inputs; (3) that, whereas dopamine D(2) receptor activation modulates the initial phase of striatal STDP, dopamine D(1)/D(5) receptor activation is critically required for striatal STDP. Thus, the timing of APs relative to cortical inputs alone is not enough to induce corticostriatal plasticity, implying that ongoing activity does not affect synaptic strength unless dopamine receptors are activated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18322089      PMCID: PMC6671189          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4402-07.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  174 in total

1.  Changes in corticostriatal connectivity during reinforcement learning in humans.

Authors:  Guillermo Horga; Tiago V Maia; Rachel Marsh; Xuejun Hao; Dongrong Xu; Yunsuo Duan; Gregory Z Tau; Barbara Graniello; Zhishun Wang; Alayar Kangarlu; Diana Martinez; Mark G Packard; Bradley S Peterson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Experimental and computational aspects of signaling mechanisms of spike-timing-dependent plasticity.

Authors:  Hidetoshi Urakubo; Minoru Honda; Keiko Tanaka; Shinya Kuroda
Journal:  HFSP J       Date:  2009-06-03

3.  Distinct coincidence detectors govern the corticostriatal spike timing-dependent plasticity.

Authors:  Elodie Fino; Vincent Paille; Yihui Cui; Teresa Morera-Herreras; Jean-Michel Deniau; Laurent Venance
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Physical delay but not subjective delay determines learning rate in prism adaptation.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tanaka; Kazuhiro Homma; Hiroshi Imamizu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Spike-timing-dependent plasticity in hippocampal CA3 neurons.

Authors:  S Astori; V Pawlak; G Köhr
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Rapid dopamine signaling differentially modulates distinct microcircuits within the nucleus accumbens during sucrose-directed behavior.

Authors:  Fabio Cacciapaglia; R Mark Wightman; Regina M Carelli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Establishing causality for dopamine in neural function and behavior with optogenetics.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Steinberg; Patricia H Janak
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  NMDAR dependent intracellular responses associated with cocaine conditioned place preference behavior.

Authors:  Stephanie K Nygard; Anthony Klambatsen; Bailey Balouch; Vanya Quinones-Jenab; Shirzad Jenab
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Cyclic AMP and afferent activity govern bidirectional synaptic plasticity in striatopallidal neurons.

Authors:  Shana M Augustin; Jeff A Beeler; Daniel S McGehee; Xiaoxi Zhuang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Dopamine-associated cached values are not sufficient as the basis for action selection.

Authors:  Nick G Hollon; Monica M Arnold; Jerylin O Gan; Mark E Walton; Paul E M Phillips
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.