OBJECTIVES: To determine and quantify differences in efficacy between treatment regimens for brucellosis. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials assessing different antibiotic regimens and durations of treatment for human brucellosis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, CENTRAL, Lilacs, conference proceedings, and bibliographies with no restrictions on language, study year, or publication status. Review methods Search, application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, data extraction, and assessment of methodological quality independently performed in duplicate. Primary outcomes were relapse and overall failure resulting from primary failure or relapse. Relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were calculated and pooled with a fixed effect model. RESULTS: 30 trials and 77 treatment arms were included. Overall failure was significantly higher with doxycycline-rifampicin compared to doxycycline-streptomycin, mainly due to a higher rate of relapse (relative risk 2.80, 95% confidence interval 1.81 to 4.36; 13 trials, without heterogeneity). Results were consistent among patients with bacteraemia and complicated brucellosis. Doxycycline-streptomycin resulted in a significantly higher rate of failure than doxycycline-rifampicin-aminoglycoside (triple drug regimen) (2.50, 1.26 to 5.00; two trials). Gentamicin was not inferior to streptomycin (1.45, 0.52 to 4.00 for failure; two trials). Quinolones combined with rifampicin were significantly less effective than doxycycline combined with rifampicin or streptomycin (1.83, 1.11 to 3.02, for failure; five trials). Monotherapy was associated with a higher risk of failure than combined treatment when administered for a similar duration (2.56, 1.55 to 4.23; five trials). Treatment for six weeks or more offered an advantage over shorter treatment durations. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in effectiveness between currently recommended treatment regimens for brucellosis. The preferred treatment should be with dual or triple regimens including an aminoglycoside.
OBJECTIVES: To determine and quantify differences in efficacy between treatment regimens for brucellosis. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials assessing different antibiotic regimens and durations of treatment for humanbrucellosis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, CENTRAL, Lilacs, conference proceedings, and bibliographies with no restrictions on language, study year, or publication status. Review methods Search, application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, data extraction, and assessment of methodological quality independently performed in duplicate. Primary outcomes were relapse and overall failure resulting from primary failure or relapse. Relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were calculated and pooled with a fixed effect model. RESULTS: 30 trials and 77 treatment arms were included. Overall failure was significantly higher with doxycycline-rifampicin compared to doxycycline-streptomycin, mainly due to a higher rate of relapse (relative risk 2.80, 95% confidence interval 1.81 to 4.36; 13 trials, without heterogeneity). Results were consistent among patients with bacteraemia and complicated brucellosis. Doxycycline-streptomycin resulted in a significantly higher rate of failure than doxycycline-rifampicin-aminoglycoside (triple drug regimen) (2.50, 1.26 to 5.00; two trials). Gentamicin was not inferior to streptomycin (1.45, 0.52 to 4.00 for failure; two trials). Quinolones combined with rifampicin were significantly less effective than doxycycline combined with rifampicin or streptomycin (1.83, 1.11 to 3.02, for failure; five trials). Monotherapy was associated with a higher risk of failure than combined treatment when administered for a similar duration (2.56, 1.55 to 4.23; five trials). Treatment for six weeks or more offered an advantage over shorter treatment durations. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in effectiveness between currently recommended treatment regimens for brucellosis. The preferred treatment should be with dual or triple regimens including an aminoglycoside.
Authors: Javier Ariza; Mile Bosilkovski; Antonio Cascio; Juan D Colmenero; Michael J Corbel; Matthew E Falagas; Ziad A Memish; Mohammad Reza Hasanjani Roushan; Ethan Rubinstein; Nikolaos V Sipsas; Javier Solera; Edward J Young; Georgios Pappas Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Jesica A Herrick; Robert J Lederman; Brigit Sullivan; John H Powers; Tara N Palmore Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: D Ozturk-Engin; H Erdem; S Gencer; S Kaya; A I Baran; A Batirel; R Tekin; M K Celen; A Denk; S Guler; M Ulug; H Turan; A U Pekok; G Mermut; S Kaya; M Tasbakan; N Tulek; Y Cag; A Inan; A Yalci; C Ataman-Hatipoglu; I Gonen; A Dogan-Celik; F Bozkurt; S Gulsun; M Sunnetcioglu; T Guven; F Duygu; E Parlak; H Sozen; S Tosun; T Demirdal; E Guclu; O Karabay; N Uzun; O Gunal; H Diktas; A Haykir-Solay; A Erbay; C Kader; O Aydin; A Erdem; N Elaldi; A Kadanali; Z Yulugkural; L Gorenek; M Altındis; S Bolukcu; C Agalar; N Ormeci Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2014-02-21 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher Journal: BMJ Date: 2009-07-21
Authors: Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2009-07-21 Impact factor: 11.069