Literature DB >> 1832185

Responses of cat muscle spindles which lack a dynamic fusimotor supply.

M Gioux1, J Petit, U Proske.   

Abstract

1. The experiments reported here support the view that some spindles in the peroneus tertius muscle of the anaesthetized cat lack a nuclear bag1 intrafusal fibre. 2. The bag1 fibre is characterized by the fact that it is innervated exclusively by dynamic fusimotor axons. A method was devised to test each spindle in peroneus tertius for a dynamic fusimotor innervation. The ventral roots containing the muscle's motor supply were subdivided into five portions, approximately equal in terms of the tension they generated, and each piece was stimulated in turn, repetitively, at fusimotor strength, during ramp stretch of the muscle, to look for a large increase in dynamic response. 3. The method allowed confirmation that the majority of spindles in peroneus tertius had a dynamic fusimotor innervation. However, where the dynamic effect was weak and accompanied by a strong static fusimotor action and extrafusal unloading, it risked being overlooked. 4. The confirmatory test for the presence of a bag1 fibre was whether or not the spindle showed a large increase in dynamic response in the presence of the drug succinyl choline (SCh) injected arterially close to the muscle in which the spindle is located. SCh is known to induce a contracture in the bag1 fibre and therefore mimics tonic dynamic fusimotor stimulation. 5. In five experiments, of a total of forty-two spindles with afferents conducting within the group I range, five examples were encountered where there was no increase in dynamic response, either with ventral root stimulation or perfusion with SCh. It was concluded that these were spindles which lacked a bag1 fibre. 6. Passive stretch of such spindles revealed no feature in the response which allowed them to be distinguished from spindles in which the bag1 fibre was present. This conclusion posed the question, what contribution, if any, does the bag1 fibre make to the stretch response? 7. It was possible to show that under some conditions the bag1 fibre did contribute to the response to stretch. If the spindle was conditioned by repetitive nerve stimulation, at fusimotor strength, at a length longer than that at which a test stretch was applied, the response to the stretch was delayed, and it began at a lower rate than after conditioning stimulation at the test length. The delayed response was attributed to the presence of slack in intrafusal fibres.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1832185      PMCID: PMC1181341          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  19 in total

1.  The central control of the dynamic response of muscle spindle receptors.

Authors:  J K JANSEN; P B MATTHEWS
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1962-05       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Activation of muscle spindles by succinylcholine and decamethonium, the effects of curare.

Authors:  R GRANIT; S SKOGLUND; S THESLEFF
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1953

3.  Properties of cat neck muscle spindles and their excitation by succinylcholine.

Authors:  R F Price; M B Dutia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Fusimotor after-effects on responses of primary endings to test dynamic stimuli in cat muscle spindles.

Authors:  F Emonet-Dénand; C C Hunt; Y Laporte
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  The number and distribution of muscle spindles and tendon organs in the peroneal muscles of the cat.

Authors:  J J Scott; H Young
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Form and distribution of sensory terminals in cat hindlimb muscle spindles.

Authors:  R W Banks; D Barker; M J Stacey
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1982-11-04       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Responses of muscle spindles depend on their history of activation and movement.

Authors:  J E Gregory; D L Morgan; U Proske
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.453

8.  One-bag-fiber muscle spindles in tenuissimus muscles of the cat.

Authors:  J Kucera
Journal:  Histochemistry       Date:  1982

9.  The after-effects of stretch and fusimotor stimulation on the responses of primary endings of cat muscle spindles.

Authors:  D L Morgan; A Prochazka; U Proske
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Activation of cat muscle spindle primary, secondary and intermediate sensory endings by suxamethonium.

Authors:  M B Dutia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  6 in total

1.  Patterns of fusimotor activity during locomotion in the decerebrate cat deduced from recordings from hindlimb muscle spindles.

Authors:  A Taylor; R Durbaba; P H Ellaway; S Rawlinson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Muscle history dependence of responses to stretch of primary and secondary endings of cat soleus muscle spindles.

Authors:  U Proske; D L Morgan; J E Gregory
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Classification of longissimus lumborum muscle spindle afferents in the anaesthetized cat.

Authors:  R Durbaba; A Taylor; P H Ellaway; S Rawlinson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Pacemaker activity in a sensory ending with multiple encoding sites: the cat muscle spindle primary ending.

Authors:  R W Banks; M Hulliger; K A Scheepstra; E Otten
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Regularity in the generation of discharge patterns by primary and secondary muscle spindle afferents, as recorded under a ramp-and-hold stretch.

Authors:  S S Schäfer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The responses of secondary endings of cat soleus muscle spindles to succinyl choline.

Authors:  A Taylor; D L Morgan; J E Gregory; U Proske
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.