Literature DB >> 18321820

Acoustic voice analysis in different phonetic contexts after larynx radiotherapy for T1 vocal cord carcinoma.

Angeles Rovirosa1, Carlos Ascaso, Rosa Abellana, Eugenio Martínez-Celdrán, Alicia Ortega, Mercedes Velasco, Montserrat Bonet, Teresa Herrero, Meritxell Arenas, Albert Biete.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Radiotherapy for early vocal cord carcinoma affects quality of voice. Nevertheless, most patients refer to having a high satisfaction level with their voice. The few acoustic studies on quality of voice have been performed only in prolonged vowel production, which is not a usual speech situation. The present study has been done with the aim of establishing which phonetic situations reflect a greater alteration in voice production related to irradiation.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighteen male patients irradiated for Tis-T1 vocal cord carcinoma and a control group of 31 non-irradiated subjects were included in a study of acoustic voice analysis. This analysis was performed one year after radiotherapy. Patients and control group voices were tape recorded in extended vowel production, oral reading of a standard paragraph, spontaneous speech and in a song. Acoustic analysis was performed by a Kay Elemetric's Computerized Speech Lab (model CSL #4300). Fundamental frequency, jitter, shimmer and harmonics-to-noise ratio were obtained in both groups. Statistical test: Lin concordance coefficient and Pearson's correlation coefficient, Student's t-test and ROC curves.
RESULTS: Concordance and correlation studies did not allow selection of any subgroup in acoustic parameters and different acoustic situations. Acoustic parameters had higher median values in irradiated patients. Student's t-test showed significant differences for fundamental frequency in sustained vowel production and spontaneous speech; for jitter there was statistical significance in all the acoustic situations and for shimmer in oral reading and song. Jitter showed a cut-off of 2.02% with a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 97% in classifying irradiated and non-irradiated groups. The ROC curve for jitter correctly classified 94% of subjects into irradiated or non-irradiated groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that jitter obtained from spontaneous speech was the most relevant parameter in discriminating voice in irradiated patients by acoustic analysis. Jitter in spontaneous speech is in need of more analysis in bigger series and in more advanced stages of larynx cancer as its relevance has been demonstrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18321820     DOI: 10.1007/s12094-008-0175-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1699-048X            Impact factor:   3.405


  29 in total

1.  Acoustic recognition of voice disorders: a comparative study of running speech versus sustained vowels.

Authors:  F Klingholtz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.

Authors:  L I Lin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Speech waveform perturbation analysis: a perceptual-acoustical comparison of seven measures.

Authors:  A G Askenfelt; B Hammarberg
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1986-03

4.  Significance of harmonic changes and noise components in hoarseness.

Authors:  N Yanagihara
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1967-09

5.  Consistency and reliability of voice quality ratings for different types of speech fragments.

Authors:  G de Krom
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-10

6.  The quality of voice in patients irradiated for laryngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  A B Karim; G B Snow; H T Siek; K H Njo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Consequences of voice impairment in daily life for patients following radiotherapy for early glottic cancer: voice quality, vocal function, and vocal performance.

Authors:  I M Verdonck-de Leeuw; R B Keus; F J Hilgers; F J Koopmans-van Beinum; A J Greven; J M de Jong; G Vreeburg; H Bartelink
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Objective evaluation of the quality of voice following radiation therapy for T1 glottic cancer.

Authors:  A Aref; J Dworkin; S Devi; L Denton; J Fontanesi
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Voice quality after treatment for T1a glottic carcinoma--radiotherapy versus laser cordectomy.

Authors:  Marco Krengli; Mario Policarpo; Irene Manfredda; Paolo Aluffi; Giuseppina Gambaro; Massimiliano Panella; Francesco Pia
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.089

10.  Voice change after radiotherapy. Some preliminary results.

Authors:  R H Colton; R H Sagerman; C T Chung; Y W Yu; G F Reed
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Effects of chemoradiotherapy on voice and swallowing.

Authors:  Cathy L Lazarus
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.064

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.