Literature DB >> 18321627

The creation of the concept of an antidepressant: an historical analysis.

Joanna Moncrieff1.   

Abstract

The concept of an "antidepressant" implies a drug that acts in a disease specific way to reverse the neuropathological basis of the symptoms of depression. However, there is little scientific research that could confirm this view. This paper reports an historical study of the emergence of the concept of the antidepressant and the social forces that influenced its adoption. Historical literature documents the increasing importance of the specificity of medical treatments in the 20th century and the increased power that they conferred on medical practitioners. In the case of depression, stimulants were used as treatment from the 1940s. During the 1950s the anti-tuberculous drugs iproniazid and isoniazid started to be portrayed as more specific than stimulants, even though their stimulant effects were well documented. When imipramine was suggested to be effective in depression, it was presented solely as acting in a disease specific way and it was soon referred to as an "antidepressant". The idea that some drugs have a specific action on the underlying basis of depression caught on rapidly and was well established by the 1960s before any evidence was available to support this view. Forces that could have driven the adoption of this view include the psychiatric profession's desire to integrate with general medicine to improve its social status and to move away from the asylum into the community. Physical interventions and drug treatments helped to boost its medical credentials and antidepressant drugs provided a convenient form of medical treatment for community-based distress. They also helped the profession to counter attacks from the antipsychiatry movement. The pharmaceutical industry too helped to establish and disseminate the view of antidepressants as disease specific treatments in order to distinguish them from non-specific drugs. This study raises questions about the view that psychiatry was transformed into a modern medical enterprise in the 1950s and 1960s by the introduction of disease specific drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18321627     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  6 in total

1.  Defending psychiatry or defending the trivial effects of therapeutic interventions? A citation content analysis of an influential paper.

Authors:  I A Cristea; F Naudet
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 6.892

2.  The 'antisocial' person: an insight in to biology, classification and current evidence on treatment.

Authors:  Chaturaka Rodrigo; Senaka Rajapakse; Gamini Jayananda
Journal:  Ann Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  A Pill for the Ill? Patients' Reports of Their Experience of the Medical Encounter in the Treatment of Depression.

Authors:  Andreas Vilhelmsson; Tommy Svensson; Anna Meeuwisse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The specificity triad: notions of disease and therapeutic specificity in biomedical reasoning.

Authors:  Shai Mulinari
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 2.464

5.  Magic bullets for mental disorders: the emergence of the concept of an "antipsychotic" drug.

Authors:  Joanna Moncrieff
Journal:  J Hist Neurosci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 0.529

6.  A randomised cross-over study assessing the "blue pyjama syndrome" in major depressive episode.

Authors:  Hélèna Delmas; Jean-Marie Batail; Bruno Falissard; Gabriel Robert; Maxence Rangé; Stéphane Brousse; Jacques Soulabaille; Dominique Drapier; Florian Naudet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.