Literature DB >> 18321264

Effects of implant surface roughness and stiffness of grafted bone on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: a 3D numerical analysis.

H-L Huang1, L-J Fuh, J-T Hsu, M-G Tu, Y-W Shen, C-L Wu.   

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of the stiffness of a maxillary sinus graft and the surface roughness of an immediately loaded implant using a non-linear three-dimensional finite element (FE) analysis (3D). Six FE models were created, including two stiffness values of grafted bone (345 and 3450 MPa of elastic modulus) and three conditions of implant-bone interfaces (Frictional coefficient of 0.3 for machined surface, 0.45 for rough implant surface and a bonded implant-bone interface for an osseointegrated implant). Computer tomographic images of a human skull were used to construct a posterior maxillary model. All implants were designed via the computer aided design software with a spiral threaded configuration. Three loading scenarios were investigated for each of the six models; axial loading and lateral loadings at 30 degrees and 60 degrees . The results showed that a 60 degrees lateral loading has scored the highest level of bone stresses among the three loading conditions. Immediately loaded implants with 0.3 frictional coefficient have suffered the highest bone stresses which were higher than those with bonded interface by about 57%. Increasing the frictional coeffecient to 0.45, however, did not show any benefits in reducing the peak bone stress. Raising the stiffness of grafted bone diminished the bone stress by about 10% in both the immediately loaded and the osseointegrated implants. It was also noted that increasing graft stiffness and implant surface roughness reduced the sliding at the implant-bone interface which may improve the implant stability and long-term survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18321264     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01817.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  6 in total

1.  Microcomputed tomography analysis of particular autogenous bone graft in sinus augmentation at 5 months: differences on bone mineral density and 3D trabecular structure.

Authors:  Heng-Li Huang; Jui-Ting Hsu; Michael Y C Chen; Cheng Liu; Ching-Han Chang; Yu-Fen Li; Kuan-Ting Chen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Standard of disocclusion in complete dentures supported by implants without free distal ends: analysis by the finite elements method.

Authors:  Gustavo Diniz Greco; Estevam Barbosa de Las Casas; Tulimar P Machado Cornacchia; Cláudia Silami de Magalhães; Allyson Nogueira Moreira
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  Comparison of Short and Standard Implants in the Posterior Mandible: A 3D Analysis Using Finite Element Method.

Authors:  Allahyar Geramy; Amirreza Rokn; Abbasali Keshtkar; Abbas Monzavi; Hamid Mahmood Hashemi; Tahereh Bitaraf
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2018-03

4.  Finite element analysis of the Union Plate in treating elderly acetabular fracture patients.

Authors:  Guixiong Huang; Kaifang Chen; Yulong Wang; Xiaodong Guo
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  The effects of bone density and crestal cortical bone thickness on micromotion and peri-implant bone strain distribution in an immediately loaded implant: a nonlinear finite element analysis.

Authors:  Tsutomu Sugiura; Kazuhiko Yamamoto; Satoshi Horita; Kazuhiro Murakami; Sadami Tsutsumi; Tadaaki Kirita
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 2.614

6.  Effects of implant tilting and the loading direction on the displacement and micromotion of immediately loaded implants: an in vitro experiment and finite element analysis.

Authors:  Tsutomu Sugiura; Kazuhiko Yamamoto; Satoshi Horita; Kazuhiro Murakami; Sadami Tsutsumi; Tadaaki Kirita
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 2.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.