OBJECTIVE: The healthcare needs of lesbians are not well understood. We sought to characterize lesbians' experiences with, and preferences for, women's healthcare. METHODS: We conducted three age-stratified focus groups (18-29, 30-50, and >50 years) with a total of 22 participants using a semistructured interview guide to elicit lesbians' experiences and preferences. We analyzed transcripts of these audiotaped sessions using the constant comparative method of grounded theory. Community-dwelling women who self-identified as lesbian and responded to advertisements were selected on first-come basis. RESULTS: Participants voiced experiences and preferences for healthcare that emerged into three themes: desired models of care, desired processes of care, and desired patient-provider relationship. Each theme was further developed into multiple subthemes. Within the subthemes we identified issues that were specific to lesbians and those that were general women's health issues. Participants preferred, but did not always receive, care that is comprehensive in scope, person centered, nondiscriminatory, and inclusive of them as lesbians. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare providers, institutions, and society should adopt an inviting, person-centered approach toward lesbians seeking healthcare, assure them access to healthcare information, and establish healthcare delivery systems that take all aspects of health into account.
OBJECTIVE: The healthcare needs of lesbians are not well understood. We sought to characterize lesbians' experiences with, and preferences for, women's healthcare. METHODS: We conducted three age-stratified focus groups (18-29, 30-50, and >50 years) with a total of 22 participants using a semistructured interview guide to elicit lesbians' experiences and preferences. We analyzed transcripts of these audiotaped sessions using the constant comparative method of grounded theory. Community-dwelling women who self-identified as lesbian and responded to advertisements were selected on first-come basis. RESULTS:Participants voiced experiences and preferences for healthcare that emerged into three themes: desired models of care, desired processes of care, and desired patient-provider relationship. Each theme was further developed into multiple subthemes. Within the subthemes we identified issues that were specific to lesbians and those that were general women's health issues. Participants preferred, but did not always receive, care that is comprehensive in scope, person centered, nondiscriminatory, and inclusive of them as lesbians. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare providers, institutions, and society should adopt an inviting, person-centered approach toward lesbians seeking healthcare, assure them access to healthcare information, and establish healthcare delivery systems that take all aspects of health into account.
Authors: Heather L McCauley; Jay G Silverman; Michele R Decker; Madina Agénor; Sonya Borrero; Daniel J Tancredi; Sarah Zelazny; Elizabeth Miller Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2015-05-11 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Kristin M Mattocks; Anne Sadler; Elizabeth M Yano; Erin E Krebs; Laurie Zephyrin; Cynthia Brandt; Rachel Kimerling; Theo Sandfort; Melissa E Dichter; Jeffrey J Weiss; Jeroan Allison; Sally Haskell Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Grayce Alencar Albuquerque; Cintia de Lima Garcia; Glauberto da Silva Quirino; Maria Juscinaide Henrique Alves; Jameson Moreira Belém; Francisco Winter dos Santos Figueiredo; Laércio da Silva Paiva; Vânia Barbosa do Nascimento; Érika da Silva Maciel; Vitor Engrácia Valenti; Luiz Carlos de Abreu; Fernando Adami Journal: BMC Int Health Hum Rights Date: 2016-01-14