Literature DB >> 18321143

Ecological risk assessment in the United States environmental protection agency: a historical overview.

Glenn W Suter1.   

Abstract

EDITOR'S NOTE: This is 1 of 4 papers from the US Environmental Protection Agency Science Advisory Board's Ecological Processes and Effects Committee workshop on the current and future practice of ecological risk assessment. The workshop was held in Washington, DC in February 2006. Risk assessment originated with the insurance industry and spread to the estimation of risks to people and property in other contexts, including the regulation of environmental contamination. Ecological assessment became an important component of environmental management in the United States with the legal mandate for environmental impact assessment in 1970. Risk assessment and ecological assessment merged in the 1980s to form ecological risk assessment (ERA). Since then, ERA has been institutionalized with the development of the US Environmental Protection Agency's (hereafter, USEPA or Agency) framework and guidance documents. Ecological risk assessment has been adapted by the Agency's program offices to fit their legal and policy contexts. The future of ERA will inevitably include the incorporation of more complex and demanding methods. However, the biggest challenge for future risk assessors will be to make ecological risks more compelling to decision makers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18321143     DOI: 10.1897/IEAM_2007-062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag        ISSN: 1551-3777            Impact factor:   2.992


  7 in total

1.  Arsenic Contamination, Water Toxicity, Source Apportionment, and Potential Health Risk in Groundwater of Jhelum Basin, Punjab, Pakistan.

Authors:  Zahid Ullah; Abdur Rashid; Junaid Ghani; Muhammad Afnan Talib; Asfandyar Shahab; Lu Lun
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.738

2.  Supporting Risk Assessment: Accounting for Indirect Risk to Ecosystem Components.

Authors:  Cathryn Clarke Murray; Megan E Mach; Rebecca G Martone; Gerald G Singh; Miriam O; Kai M A Chan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A preliminary approach to quantifying the overall environmental risks posed by development projects during environmental impact assessment.

Authors:  Sam Nicol; Iadine Chadès
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  The pros and cons of ecological risk assessment based on data from different levels of biological organization.

Authors:  Jason R Rohr; Christopher J Salice; Roger M Nisbet
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 6.184

5.  Bayesian Network Applications for Sustainable Holistic Water Resources Management: Modeling Opportunities for South Africa.

Authors:  Indrani Hazel Govender; Ullrika Sahlin; Gordon C O'Brien
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.302

6.  Air Pollution in Kazakhstan and Its Health Risk Assessment.

Authors:  D Kenessary; A Kenessary; Z Adilgireiuly; N Akzholova; A Erzhanova; A Dosmukhametov; D Syzdykov; Abdul-Razak Masoud; Timur Saliev
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 2.462

7.  Environmental Goals Addressed in Assessments of Contaminated Sediments.

Authors:  Peter Bruce; Yvonne Ohlsson
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 2.992

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.