Literature DB >> 18320438

Risks associated with cryopreservation: a survey of assisted conception units in the UK and Ireland.

Mathew Tomlinson1, David Morroll.   

Abstract

A number of recent, high-profile incidents involving loss or damage to cryopreserved material held in IVF units or sperm storage centres have highlighted the need for centres to carefully review their cryostorage practice and take action. Critical disasters involving lost or damaged patient material, although high profile, are still thought to be rare, and there has been concern that we should ensure that any response is proportionate to risk. However, as no regulators, manufacturers or similar professional disciplines have collected information in the long term, our knowledge of the true incidence of such adverse events is extremely poor. Recognizing the need for some solid data, the UK Association of Clinical Embryologists (ACE) conducted a survey on the subject, at its joint meeting with the Association of Irish Clinical Embryologists (ICE) (January, 2006). Questions were asked in relation to the risk of: injury to personnel; and potential loss of and potential damage to stored material. The number of serious and not so serious adverse events/situations relating to both staff and sample safety are discussed in detail. The incidence of problems was certainly higher than we had imagined; the lack of general training and awareness amongst our staff is a serious cause for concern, and appears to leave the industry vulnerable. Moreover, the survey highlighted the need for a coordinated approach to the collection of more detailed information both prospectively and retrospectively. Regulators, manufacturers, allied professional bodies and, more importantly, centres should be encouraged to share both recent and historic data relating to adverse events, in order that accurate risk assessments can be made in future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18320438     DOI: 10.1080/14647270701553280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Fertil (Camb)        ISSN: 1464-7273            Impact factor:   2.767


  3 in total

1.  Early detection of cryostorage tank failure using a weight-based monitoring system.

Authors:  Zahava P Michaelson; Sai T Bondalapati; Selma Amrane; Robert W Prosser; Daniel M Hill; Pallavi Gaur; Matt Recio; David E Travassos; Mikaela D Wolfkamp; Sasha Sadowy; Colin Thomas; Eric J Forman; Zev Williams
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Cryostorage failures: a medicolegal review.

Authors:  Christopher P Moutos; Rana Lahham; John Y Phelps
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Risk of Contamination of Gametes and Embryos during Cryopreservation and Measures to Prevent Cross-Contamination.

Authors:  Daniel C Joaquim; Eduardo D Borges; Iara G R Viana; Paula A Navarro; Alessandra A Vireque
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.