Literature DB >> 18320265

Spatial analysis of soil erosion and sediment fluxes: a paired watershed study of two Rappahannock River tributaries, Stafford County, Virginia.

Matthew C Ricker1, Ben K Odhiambo, Joseph M Church.   

Abstract

Soil erosion is a serious problem in areas with expanding construction, agricultural production, and improper storm water management. It is important to understand the major processes affecting sediment delivery to surficial water bodies in order to tailor effective mitigation and outreach activities. This study analyzes how naturally occurring and anthropogenic influences, such as urbanization and soil disturbance on steep slopes, are reflected in the amount of soil erosion and sediment delivery within sub-watershed-sized areas. In this study, two sub-watersheds of the Rappahannock River, Horsepen Run and Little Falls Run, were analyzed using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) and a sediment delivery ratio (SDR) to estimate annual sediment flux rates. The RUSLE/SDR analyses for Horsepen Run and Little Falls Run predicted 298 Mg/y and 234 Mg/y, respectively, but nearly identical per-unit-area sediment flux rates of 0.15 Mg/ha/y and 0.18 Mg/ha/y. Suspended sediment sampling indicated greater amounts of sediment in Little Falls Run, which is most likely due to anthropogenic influences. Field analyses also suggest that all-terrain vehicle crossings represent the majority of sediment flux derived from forested areas of Horsepen Run. The combined RUSLE/SDR and field sampling data indicate that small-scale anthropogenic disturbances (ATV trails and construction sites) play a major role in overall sediment flux rates for both basins and that these sites must be properly accounted for when evaluating sediment flux rates at a sub-watershed scale.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18320265     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-008-9094-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  4 in total

1.  Assessing site vulnerability to phosphorus loss in an agricultural watershed.

Authors:  A N Sharpley; R W McDowell; J L Weld; P J Kleinman
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.751

2.  Regional scale variability in sediment and nutrient delivery from small agricultural watersheds.

Authors:  Gert Verstraeten; Jean Poesen
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.751

3.  Effects of changing forest and impervious land covers on discharge characteristics of watersheds.

Authors:  Robert C Wissmar; Raymond K Timm; Miles G Logsdon
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Assessing the effect of natural controls and land use change on sediment yield in a major Andean River: the Magdalena drainage basin, Colombia.

Authors:  Juan Darío Restrepo; James P M Syvitski
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.129

  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Soil erosion and sediment fluxes analysis: a watershed study of the Ni Reservoir, Spotsylvania County, VA, USA.

Authors:  Ian C Pope; Ben K Odhiambo
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Hydroacoustic and spatial analysis of sediment fluxes and accumulation rates in two Virginia reservoirs, USA.

Authors:  E V Clark; B K Odhiambo; S Yoon; L Pilati
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Use RUSLE2 model to assess the impact of soil erosion on playa inundation and hydrophyte conditions in the Rainwater Basin, Nebraska.

Authors:  Zhenghong Tang; Yue Gu; Weiguo Jiang; Yuan Xue; Andy Bishop; Ted LaGrange; Eleanor Nugent
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Effects of forested floodplain soil properties on phosphorous concentrations in two Chesapeake Bay sub-watersheds, Virginia, USA.

Authors:  B K Odhiambo; M C Ricker; L M Le Blanc; K A Moxey
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 4.223

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.