Literature DB >> 18320183

Who volunteers for phase I clinical trials? Influences of anxiety, social anxiety and depressive symptoms on self-selection and the reporting of adverse events.

Luis Almeida1, Todd B Kashdan, Teresa Nunes, Rui Coelho, António Albino-Teixeira, Patrício Soares-da-Silva.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of anxiety, social anxiety and depressive symptoms on the willingness of healthy subjects to volunteer for phase I studies and to report adverse events.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A group of healthy subjects who had never participated in a clinical trial ("Naïve Subjects") were invited to participate in a phase I study. All subjects were assessed for trait anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, STAI-T), social anxiety (Social Avoidance and Distress, SAD, and Fear of Negative Evaluation, FNE) and depressive symptomatology (Beck Depression Inventory, BDI-II). Subjects who accepted the invitation to participate were compared with those who refused. The personality traits of a group of "Actual Participants" were examined, and the relation of these traits to adverse events reported during participation was evaluated.
RESULTS: A significant inverse correlation was found between the STAI-T (R = -0.203, p < 0.05) and SAD (R = -0.204, p < 0.05) scores and the willingness to participate. Naïve Subjects who refused the invitation to participate showed higher scores on STAI-T (Z = -2.600, p < 0.01) and SAD (Z = -2.524, p < 0.05) inventories. Logistic regression using BDI-II, STAI-T, SAD and FNE as covariates also showed that the only unique predictors of participation were the STAI-T (p < 0.05) and SAD (p < 0.01) scores. Significant positive correlations were found between trait anxiety and reporting of adverse events.
CONCLUSION: Participants in phase I studies are a self-selected sample defined by low trait-anxiety and social avoidance behaviors. This self-selection bias may affect the study results because less anxious subjects tend to report fewer adverse events. The characterization of a participant's personality traits may be important in phase I studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18320183     DOI: 10.1007/s00228-008-0468-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   3.064


  19 in total

1.  Scoring error of social avoidance and distress scale and its psychometric implications.

Authors:  Stefan G Hofmann; Patricia Marten DiBartolo; Robert M Holaway; Richard G Heimberg
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.505

2.  Differential effects of dopaminergic drugs on anxiety and arousal in healthy volunteers with high and low anxiety.

Authors:  Y Mizuki; M Suetsugi; I Ushijima; M Yamada
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.067

3.  Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety.

Authors:  D Watson; R Friend
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1969-08

4.  On the significance of host factors that affect drug disposition.

Authors:  E S Vesell
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Social anxiety, depressive symptoms, and post-event rumination: affective consequences and social contextual influences.

Authors:  Todd B Kashdan; John E Roberts
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2006-07-21

6.  Differential effects of noradrenergic drugs on anxiety and arousal in healthy volunteers with high and low anxiety.

Authors:  Y Mizuki; M Suetsugi; I Ushijima; M Yamada
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.067

7.  Symptoms of depression and anxiety, and screening for mental disorders in migrainous patients.

Authors:  F Kowacs; M P Socal; S C Ziomkowski; V F Borges-Neto; D P Toniolo; C R M Francesconi; M L F Chaves
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.292

8.  Clinical profiles relating gender and depressive symptoms among adolescents ascertained by the Beck Depression Inventory II.

Authors:  R Coelho; A Martins; H Barros
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.361

9.  Self-selection for personality variables among healthy volunteers.

Authors:  M S Pieters; A Jennekens-Schinkel; H C Schoemaker; A F Cohen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Private self-consciousness and fear of negative evaluation.

Authors:  M M Monfries; N F Kafer
Journal:  J Psychol       Date:  1994-07
View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  CYP2D6 variation, behaviour and psychopathology: implications for pharmacogenomics-guided clinical trials.

Authors:  Eva M Peñas-Lledó; Adrián Llerena
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Increase in body mass index from normal weight to overweight in a cross-sectional sample of healthy research volunteers.

Authors:  Amber B Courville; Meagan DiVito; Lindsay Moyer; Anna Rossinoff; Caitlin Royster; Tricia Psota; Elaine Ayres; Kirsten L Zambell
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Factors associated with enrolment in clinical trials among women with early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  D Presti; J Havas; D Soldato; P Lapidari; E Martin; B Pistilli; C Jouannaud; G Emile; O Rigal; M Fournier; P Soulie; M-A Mouret-Reynier; C Tarpin; M Campone; S Guillermet; A-L Martin; S Everhard; A Di Meglio
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2022-06-17

4.  A planned, prospective comparison of short-term quality of life outcomes among older patients with breast cancer treated with standard chemotherapy in a randomized clinical trial vs. an observational study: CALGB #49907 and #369901.

Authors:  Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Solomon B Makgoeng; Gheorghe Luta; Arti Hurria; Gretchen Kimmick; Claudine Isaacs; Michelle Tallarico; William T Barry; Brandy Pitcher; Eric P Winer; Clifford Hudis; Harvey J Cohen; Hyman B Muss
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.599

5.  CT-Screening for lung cancer does not increase the use of anxiolytic or antidepressant medication.

Authors:  Linda Kaerlev; Maria Iachina; Jesper Holst Pedersen; Anders Green; Bente Mertz Nørgård
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Characteristics associated with willingness to participate in a randomized controlled behavioral clinical trial using home-based personal computers and a webcam.

Authors:  Hiroko H Dodge; Yuriko Katsumata; Jian Zhu; Nora Mattek; Molly Bowman; Mattie Gregor; Katherine Wild; Jeffrey A Kaye
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  The Effectiveness of Computerized Cognitive Training Combined With Whole Body Cryotherapy in Improving Cognitive Functions in Older Adults. A Case Control Study.

Authors:  Adrianna Senczyszyn; Renata Wallner; Dorota Maria Szczesniak; Mateusz Łuc; Joanna Rymaszewska
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.157

8.  Sampling bias in an internet treatment trial for depression.

Authors:  L Donkin; I B Hickie; H Christensen; S L Naismith; B Neal; N L Cockayne; N Glozier
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 6.222

9.  Motivation to persist with internet-based cognitive behavioural treatment using blended care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Maja Wilhelmsen; Kjersti Lillevoll; Mette Bech Risør; Ragnhild Høifødt; May-Lill Johansen; Knut Waterloo; Martin Eisemann; Nils Kolstrup
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.630

10.  Adverse events and deterioration reported by participants in the PACE trial of therapies for chronic fatigue syndrome.

Authors:  Dominic Dougall; Anthony Johnson; Kimberley Goldsmith; Michael Sharpe; Brian Angus; Trudie Chalder; Peter White
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.