Tumor-derived vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has previously been identified as a causative factor in the disturbed differentiation of myeloid dendritic cells (DC) in advanced cancer patients. Here, we investigated the potential of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibition to overcome this defective DC differentiation. To this end, peripheral blood DC (PBDC) precursor and subset frequencies were measured in 13 patients with advanced cancer before and after treatment with AZD2171, a TK inhibitor (TKI) of VEGFR, coadministered with gefitinib, and an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) TKI. Of note, not only myeloid DC but also plasmacytoid DC frequencies were significantly reduced in the blood of the cancer patients prior to treatment, as compared to healthy controls. Moreover, besides an accumulated population of immature myeloid cells (ImC), a population of myeloid suppressor cells (MSC) was significantly increased. Upon systemic VEGFR TK inhibition, DC frequencies did not increase, whereas the rate of circulating MSC showed a slight, but not significant, decrease. In conclusion, TK inhibition of VEGFR with AZD2171 does not restore the defective PBDC differentiation observed in advanced cancer patients.
Tumor-derived vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has previously been identified as a causative factor in the disturbed differentiation of myeloid dendritic cells (DC) in advanced cancerpatients. Here, we investigated the potential of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibition to overcome this defective DC differentiation. To this end, peripheral blood DC (PBDC) precursor and subset frequencies were measured in 13 patients with advanced cancer before and after treatment with AZD2171, a TK inhibitor (TKI) of VEGFR, coadministered with gefitinib, and an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) TKI. Of note, not only myeloid DC but also plasmacytoid DC frequencies were significantly reduced in the blood of the cancerpatients prior to treatment, as compared to healthy controls. Moreover, besides an accumulated population of immature myeloid cells (ImC), a population of myeloid suppressor cells (MSC) was significantly increased. Upon systemic VEGFRTK inhibition, DC frequencies did not increase, whereas the rate of circulating MSC showed a slight, but not significant, decrease. In conclusion, TK inhibition of VEGFR with AZD2171 does not restore the defective PBDC differentiation observed in advanced cancerpatients.
Defective dendritic cell (DC) differentiation, maturation, and
functionality are possible mechanisms underlying impaired antitumor immunity in
cancerpatients [1]. DCs play a central role in the immune system as powerful
antigen-presenting cells, and are essential for the induction of tumor-specific
T-cell-mediated immune responses [2]. In cancerpatients, the frequencies of
circulating DCs are significantly lower as compared to healthy individuals
[3-5]. Accumulation of immature myeloid cells (ImC) and functionally impaired
DCs has been documented in blood, tumors, and tumor-draining lymph nodes and
found to be a poor prognostic factor [3, 4, 6]. Preclinical studies show that
tumor-induced inhibition of DC differentiation is mediated by tumor-derived
soluble factors such as IL-10, IL-6, M-CSF, prostaglandins, and vascular endothelial
growth factor (VEGF) [7-11].VEGF, produced by most tumors, is a strong inhibitor of myeloid DC
differentiation in vitro [7]
and affects the early stages of functional DC differentiation [12, 13]. High-systemic
VEGF levels, present in most cancerpatients, correlate with low DC frequencies
[3, 4], while abnormally elevated numbers of immature DC precursors reportedly
decreased in three out of three cancerpatients during treatment with the
anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab [3].VEGF is also one of the most important proangiogenic molecules and
induces proliferation, differentiation, and migration of endothelial cells in
tumors. Over the past decades, many trials with inhibitors of angiogenesis have
been conducted and have resulted in the registration of bevacizumab as an anticancer
therapy [14]. VEGF exerts its effect via binding to three tyrosine kinase (TK)
receptors, VEGFR-1, -2, and -3, which are mainly, but not exclusively, present
on endothelial cells (VEGFR-1, and -2) and lymphatic endothelium (VEGFR-3)
[15]. Blocking VEGF signaling by inhibiting TK activity of its receptor, is a
promising anticancer strategy. AZD2171 is a novel potent inhibitor of VEGFR-2
kinase activity, with additional activity against VEGFR-1 and -3 [16].Currently, AZD2171 is being evaluated in clinical trials as an oral anticancer
agent with antiangiogenic effects in a variety of solid tumors. To further
investigate the relationship between VEGFR signaling and DC differentiation, we
evaluated the effect of administration of the VEGFR inhibitor AZD2171 on
peripheral blood DC (PBDC) subsets in advanced cancerpatients. To our
knowledge, this is the first study to monitor DC subsets in the blood of cancerpatients who are treated with a VEGFRtyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI).
2. MATERIAL AND METHODS
2.1. Patients and healthy donors
Between May 2004 and December 2004, 13 patients of the VU Medical
Center, Amsterdam, were selected to participate in a phase I study combining
AZD2171 (AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA) a VEGFR TKI [16], with
gefitinib (AstraZeneca, Wilmington DE), a TKI of the epidermal growth factor
receptor (EGFR). The dose of AZD2171 was escalated in small, consecutive
cohorts of advanced cancerpatients coadministered with 250 mg gefitinib in
order to establish a maximum-tolerated dose. Thirteen patients (three women and
ten men) were included in one of the three-AZD2171 dosing cohorts: 20 mg ( =
3), 30 mg ( = 7), and 45 mg ( = 3). Major inclusion criteria were locally
advanced or disseminated disease, which was refractory to standard therapy,
age over 18 years, and a performance status of 0–2. Excluded were patients with
impaired renal or liver function or inadequate bone marrow reserve. The
clinical trial was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee, and after
obtaining informed consent, blood from the patients (mean age of 52, range from
31 to 66) was drawn before treatment and after four or five weeks of daily oral
dosing of both drugs (depending on the dosing schedule of the protocol). A
variety of primary tumors was represented: colon cancer ( = 3), mesothelioma
( = 2), melanoma ( = 2), fibrosarcoma, osteosarcoma, renal cell cancer,
cervical cancer, pancreas cancer, and NSCLC (all = 1). After four or five
weeks of treatment, tumor status was evaluated according to RECIST [17].Two control groups were included. First, blood was drawn from nine age-
and sex-matched healthy donors (two women and seven men, mean age of 47, range from
32 to 55) to collect peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). A second
control group consisted of four advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
patients (a woman and three men, mean age of 61, range from 51 to 66) who
received gefitinib monotherapy. PBMCs were obtained at baseline and four weeks
after daily dosing of 250 mg gefitinib.
2.2. PBDC monitoring
PBMCs were isolated by Ficoll density-gradient centrifugation
(Lymphoprep, Oslo, Norway) within 24 hours of blood sampling. FACS analysis
(Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) was performed to measure peripheral
blood DC (PBDC) subset frequencies and their maturation status using four-color
staining with antibodies directly conjugated with fluorochromes FITC, PE,
PerCP-Cy5, or APC. Monoclonal antibodies against the following markers were
used: CD3, CD11c, CD14, CD19, CD56, CD86, CD123, EGFR, HLA-DR (all BD
Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), BDCA-1, BDCA-2, BDCA-3, BDCA-4 (all Miltenyi
Biotec GmbH, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany), VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2 (R&D Systems,
Minneapolis, MN, USA), and CD33 (Immunotech, Marseille, France). A gate was set
on the population containing lymphocyte and monocytes, based on the forward and sideward
scatter plots to avoid erythrocytes, cell debris, and neutrophil contamination.Data were obtained from a minimum of 150.000 cells and were analyzed
using CellQuest software (Macintosh). Results are shown as percentages of the
total number of PBMCs. Labeled isotype-matched IgG antibodies were used to
determine background fluorescence in each analysis. Median fluorescence indices
were calculated by dividing the median expression of the antibody of interest
by the median background fluorescence as determined by the isotype-matched IgG
antibody.Different PBDC precursor populations and subsets were studied,
reflecting different stages of development (schematically presented for the
myeloid lineage in Figure 1).
Figure 1
A model of myeloid dendritic cell
differentiation under cancer conditions, in which tumor-derived factors exert
their inhibitory effect at the stage of immature Lin−CD11c+
HLA-DR−
myeloid cells (ImCs), blocking their differentiation into
mature myeloid DC precursors (pMDC), while, simultaneously, skewing their
differentiation towards a population of CD14+
HLA-DRneg/low myeloid suppressive cells (MSCs). HPCs: hematopoietic cells; Lin: lineage markers (CD3, CD14, CD19, and
CD56); MDC: myeloid dendritic cell.
Myeloid
DC (MDC)
Immature myeloid cells (ImC), previously
identified as MDC or macrophage precursors in varying stages of differentiation
[18], were defined as positive for CD11c, but negative for the lineage (Lin)
markers CD3 (T cells), CD14 (monocytes), CD19 (B cells), and CD56 (NK cells),
as well as for HLA-DR as previously described [3]. More mature MDC precursors
(pMDC) were defined as CD11chi Lin−HLA-DR+, and
the frequencies of two MDC subsets contained within this population were more
specifically determined based on the expression of blood DC antigen (BDCA) markers: DCs
belonging to the so-called myeloid DC subset 1 (MDC-1) were identified as
CD11chi,
, and
BDCA-1/CD1c+, and MDC-2 were detected as CD11c+, , and
BDCA-3/CD141+[19].
Plasmacytoid
DC (PDC)
PDCs
were detected as , , CD123hi,
and BDCA-2+, or as Lin−BDCA4+. As previously
described, in blood, both BDCA-2 and BDCA-4 are exclusively expressed on PDCs
[19].
2.3. Measurement of circulating VEGF
At the time of PBMC isolation, serum samples were also collected. After
clot formation (60 minutes at room temperature) and centrifugation, serum was
harvested and stored at 80°C. Circulating VEGF levels were measured in
serum samples with a Quantikine ELISA kit (R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN,
USA), following the manufacturer's instructions.
2.4. Statistical analysis
Since we could not assume a normal distribution of the DC subset
frequencies, we applied nonparametric tests. Percentages of PBDCs and levels of
circulating VEGF obtained from samples during VEGFRTK inhibition were compared
with baseline values using a Wilcoxon signed ranks test and a paired t test,
respectively, to determine statistical significance. In addition, the
Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine significance of differences between
patient and healthy donor data. Differences were considered to be statistically
significant when P < .05.
3. RESULTS
Thirteen patients included in the phase I study combining AZD2171 with
gefitinib participated in the DC monitoring study. Preliminary efficacy of
treatment was observed in four patients. In one patient, a partial remission
was observed; in three patients a decrease in tumor size was noticed, but this
decrease did not reach the criteria for partial remission and was considered a
stable disease.
3.1. VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, and EGFR expression on the studied PBDC subsets
Different PBDC precursor populations and subsets were studied, reflecting
different stages of development, as described in “Materials and Methods” section
(see also Figure 1). To establish the ImC and pMDC and the MDC and PDC subsets
as viable targets for the employed VEGFR and EGFR TKIs, expression levels of
VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, and EGFR were determined and expressed by their median
fluorescence indices (med FI). Both VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 were expressed, albeit
at generally low levels, on ImC and on pMDC (med FI range from 2.1 to 3.1), as
well as on the MDC-1, MDC-2, and PDC subsets (med FI range from 2.0 to 3.8). In
contrast, EGFR was not expressed on any of the studied PBDC subsets or
precursor stages (med FI range from 0.4 to 0.9).
3.2. PBDC frequencies before and after VEGFR TK
inhibition
3.2.1. Immature myeloid cells (ImC) and MDC precursors (pMDC)
Almand et al. [3]reported an
accumulation of immature Lin−HLA-DR− ImC in the blood of cancerpatients, while
more mature Lin−HLA-DR+MDC precursors (pMDC) were found
to be reduced. To further characterize these populations, we included the
myeloid lineage-associated markers CD11c and CD33. BDCA-4 (neuropilin-1,
expressed by PDC) was included in our analyses to ascertain if the previously
reported accumulation of immature DC precursors contained within the Lin−DR−ImC fraction might actually involve PDCs. Typical results, shown in Figure 2(a),
demonstrate that the Lin−HLA-DR− ImC were CD11c+
and did not express
BDCA-4, and were, therefore, unlikely to include PDCs. In Figure
2(a), CD33
expression is shown for the Lin−CD11chi
HLA-DR+ pMDC population. Within this pMDC population, two subpopulations
were clearly
discernable based on different CD33 expression levels (indicated as A and B in
Figure 2(a)). As CD33 is a myeloid marker known to be
associated with PBDC
differentiation and previously shown to be highly expressed on the MDC-1 and
MDC-2 subsets but not on an immature DC progenitor subset [20], we take this
CD33hi population to represent a more mature MDC population.
Figure 2
Typical results of blood DC analysis based on
the absence of lineage (Lin) markers (CD3, CD14, CD19, and CD56) in a patient
with mesothelioma. Events are gated for the absence of Lin marker expression
and the presence of CD33 expression. Lin− cells, that is, immature
myeloid cells (ImCs) and more mature MDC precursors (pMDC), were distinguished
from plasmacytoid dendritic cells (PDC) by BDCA-4 expression (a). CD33 expression was determined for
the CD11chi HLA-DR+ population. Within the HLA-DR
positive population (pMDC), two subpopulations (A and B) were discernable based
on intermediate and high CD33 expression (a).
Results for immature myeloid cells (ImC and Lin− HLA-DR−)
(b) and mature MDC precursors (pMDC
and Lin− CD33hi HLA-DRhi)
(c) are shown for healthy donors and for
cancer patients before (predose) and after VEGFR inhibition (postdose) (c). Peripheral blood DC percentages are
of total peripheral blood mononuclear cells. In both graphs, individual values
and the means are shown.
We did observe a slight accumulation of ImC in the advanced cancerpatients (based on pretreatment frequencies), but this did not reach the level
of significance when compared to healthy donors (Figure 2(b)). Of note, within
the pMDC population, cells with high CD33 expression levels (population B in
Figure 2(a)) were significantly decreased in the cancerpatients before
treatment, as compared to the healthy donors ( = .02, Figure 2(c)). In the cancerpatients, VEGFRTK inhibition through AZD2171 treatment did
not significantly change the frequencies of the MDC precursors in any of these
different stages of development
(Figures 2(b), 2(c)). Of note,
Figure 2(c) shows three
outlying postdose pMDC frequencies well above the mean of the postdose cancerpatient group. In conjunction with a restoration of pMDC frequencies to values within
the range observed for healthy donors, these three patients experienced
clinical benefit from AZD2171 and gefitinib treatment: two patients had a minor
response and the third patient had stable disease lasting for 31 weeks.
3.2.2. Myeloid suppressor cells (MSC)
We identified a population of CD14+HLA-DRneg/low
cells in the blood of our patients (Figure 3(a)),
which, before treatment, was
significantly increased as compared to healthy donors ( = .005,
Figure 3(b)). A recent report suggests that these so-called myeloid suppressor
cells (MSC) exert immunosuppressive effects via secretion of cytokines
including a transforming growth factor (TGF)-β [21]. Hypothetically, these MSC
may derive from ImC accumulating due to disturbed DC differentiation (see Figure 1). After four to five weeks of treatment with AZD2171, MSC frequencies in the
cancerpatients went down, although not significantly ( = .08,
Figure 3(b)). Of note, normalization upon VEGFRTK inhibition of extremely high
predose MSC frequencies in two patients (clear outliers of > 2% of PBMCs in
Figure 3(b)) was in both cases followed by a minor
clinical response.
Figure 3
Results for myeloid suppressor cells (CD14+ HLA-DRneg/low)
in healthy donors and in cancer patients before and
after VEGFR inhibition. Typical results of myeloid suppressor cells in a
patient and one healthy donor are shown (a).
Peripheral blood DC percentages are of total peripheral blood mononuclear
cells. The individual values and the means for healthy donors and cancer
patients before (predose) and after VEGFR TKI inhibition (postdose) are shown
(b).
3.2.3. Myeloid (MDC-1
and MDC-2) and plasmacytoid (PDC) DC subsets
Typical pretreatment FACS data for MDC-1 (BDCA-1/CD1c+),
MDC-2 (BDCA-3/CD141+), and PDC (BDCA-2/CD303+) from one
patient are shown in Figure 4, next to comparable data from a healthy donor.
Pretreatment MDC subset frequencies in the mononuclear cell population were
significantly lower in the blood of cancerpatients as compared to healthy
donors (MDC-1: patients % [mean ± SD] versus controls %, = .002; MDC-2:
patients % versus controls %, = .001; Figures 4(g), 4(h)).
Of note, PDC frequencies in the blood of the cancerpatients were also
significantly decreased (patients % versus controls %; = 0.04; Figure 4(i)).
Treatment with AZD2171 did not raise the frequencies of the MDC-1, MDC-2, or
PDC subsets in patients with advanced cancer (Figures 4(g)–4(i)).
Figure 4
Typical results of peripheral blood DC
monitoring based on BDCA marker analysis of a patient with fibrosarcoma (a, c, e)
and one healthy donor (b, d, f). Plots for MDC-1 (BDCA-1/CD1c+ (a, b)),
MDC-2 (BDCA-3/CD141+ (c, d)), and PDC (BDCA-2/CD303+ (e, f))
are shown. In all plots,
peripheral blood DC percentages are of total peripheral blood mononuclear cells
and based on the absence of CD14 expression. MDC-1 frequencies in healthy
donors and in cancer patients before (predose) and after VEGFR inhibition (postdose)
(g), MDC-2 frequencies in healthy
donors and in cancer patients before (predose) and after VEGFR inhibition
(postdose) (h), and PDC frequencies
in healthy donors and in cancer patients before (predose) and after VEGFR
inhibition (postdose) (i) are shown.
Peripheral blood DC percentages are of total peripheral blood mononuclear
cells. In all graphs, individual values and the means are shown.
Absolute numbers of the measured DC subsets per mL of blood were also
calculated, and these numbers were not significantly affected by the TKI
therapy either (data not shown). Apart from the anecdotal observations for the
pMDC and MSC discussed above, no further correlations could be established
between the dose of AZD2171 or the tumor response and the measured ImC, PBDC,
or MSC frequencies.Since patients received daily dosing of both AZD2171 and 250 mg
gefitinib, we also included four advanced NSCLCpatients receiving 250 mg
gefitinib monotherapy to distinguish between any effects of VEGFR and EGFR
inhibition. Gefitinib monotherapy did not affect the PBDC nor the MSC
frequencies in the blood of the studied cancerpatients (data not shown),
consistent with the observed lack of EGFR expression on these cell populations.
3.3. PBDC maturation status before and after VEGFR TK
inhibition
To assess the maturation status of the pMDC, MDC, and PDC subsets before
and after VEGFRTK inhibition, expression levels of CD86 and/or HLA-DR were
determined. Median fluorescence indices for healthy donors and cancerpatients
are listed in Table 1. No significant differences in CD86 and/or HLA-DR
expression levels on the pMDC, MDC, and PDC subsets were found between healthy
volunteers ( = 8) and tested cancerpatients ( = 13), neither before nor
after treatment with AZD2171.
Table 1
Expression of CD86 and HLA-DR on PBDC subsetsa.
PBDC subset
pMDC
MDC-1
MDC-2
PDC
HLA-DR
CD86
HLA-DR
CD86
HLA-DR
CD86
HLA-DR
Healthy donorsb
60.4
18.4
802
5.4
517.1
2.5
295.7
(7.3–274.8)
(7.2–31.6)
(403.3–1471.6)
(3.0–6.4)
(196.4–1251.4)
(1.3–3.5)
(165.6–469.7)
Cancer patientsc, predose
63.9
17.5
650.4
10.4
317.5
2.6
253.6
(19.9–212.4)
(7.7–55.5)
(166.2–1028.1)
(2.3–41.4)
(46.9–854.5)
(1.2–3.3)
(61.8–528.6)
Cancer patients, postdosed
51.9
13.1
495.3
7.5
264.2
2.5
251.2
(26.2–134.1)
(7.9–33.7)
(264.2–842.6)
(2.2–11.0)
(139.6–395.8)
(1.6–4.0)
(123.6–427.4)
aMean and range of
median fluorescence index are listed.
bHealthy donors,
= 8
cCancer patients,
= 13
dPostdose, after
4-5 weeks of VEGFR inhibition.
3.4. Circulating VEGF levels
To correlate the levels of tumor-derived VEGF to PBDC frequencies, serum
levels of VEGF were measured. We measured 2-fold higher levels of serum VEGF in
the cancerpatients at baseline than previously reported in healthy donors
[22]. Interestingly, serum VEGF levels in cancerpatients tended to increase
after four to five weeks of treatment with AZD2171 and gefitinib with a mean
pretreatment VEGF level of 626 pg/ml (range from 114 to 2847 pg/ml) and a mean
posttreatment level of 947 pg/ml (range from 245 to 3360 pg/ml; = .2). VEGFRTK inhibition is known to up-regulate circulating VEGF levels,
which has previously been demonstrated for multiple VEGFRTK inhibitors [23, 24]. In our studies, no correlation was found between serum VEGF levels and
ImC, PBDC, or MSC frequencies, neither before nor after treatment. In addition,
no correlation was observed between serum VEGF levels and clinical outcome.
4. DISCUSSION
Since VEGF has been shown to block DC differentiation and maturation in
preclinical models, high levels of VEGF in cancerpatients may induce an
accumulation of immature and functionally impaired DC contributing to tumor
escape from immunosurveillance. As indicated in Figure 1 and based on previous
reports [3], we hypothesized that tumor-derived VEGF might exert its inhibitory
effect at the stage of immature HLA-DR−MDC precursors within the
ImC fraction blocking their development into pMDC, while simultaneously skewing
their differentiation towards a newly identified population of myeloid CD14+HLA-DRneg/low suppressor cells with immunosuppressive traits [21].We, therefore, evaluated the effect of administration of the VEGFR TKI AZD2171
on PBDC precursor and subset frequencies in advanced cancerpatients. It is
important to keep in mind that conclusions drawn from this study may be
hampered by the applied phase I study design, including multiple dose levels
and a heterogeneous patient population. Nevertheless, we found an increased
number of immature DC precursors in cancerpatients, although this difference
did not reach the level of significance. We also identified a significantly
increased number of CD14+HLA-DRneg/low MSC in the blood
of cancerpatients as compared to healthy donors ( = .005),
which tended to be lower after four or five weeks of VEGFR inhibition.
Furthermore, we found that the frequencies of pMDCs, including MDC-1 and MDC-2,
were significantly reduced in advanced cancerpatients as compared to healthy
individuals. In addition, PDC frequencies were significantly reduced in cancerpatients compared to healthy donors as previously reported for patients with
Kaposi sarcoma or advanced prostate cancer [25, 26]. These results point to a
generalized defective DC differentiation, involving multiple DC lineages,
across a variety of different tumor types. Thus the effect of advanced tumors
on DC differentiation is systemic and results in a profound reduction of mature
DC precursors in the circulation and a simultaneous accumulation of immature
myeloid DC precursors with a potentially immunosuppressive role (Figure 1), in
line with previous reports [3, 4, 6]. After a period of four to five weeks of
AZD2171 administration, we did not observe an overall significant increase in
pMDC (or indeed, PDC) frequencies, nor did we observe a difference between CD86
and/or HLA-DR expression levels on pMDCs and PBDCs in cancerpatients versus
healthy donors. This is in contrast to earlier findings by Almand et al. [3],
who reported a lower expression of costimulatory molecules on immature myeloid
cells.Might the duration and dosing of AZD2171 administration have been
insufficient to effect a reversal of the observed systemic DC differentiation?
A period of four or five weeks of AZD2171 administration should be sufficient
to affect PBDC frequencies, since frequencies of DC precursors were reported to
improve already three to four weeks after tumor resection [3, 5]. Although it
remains to be formally proven that AZD2171 actually inhibits the
phosphorylation of VEGFR on PBMCs, pharmacokinetic data show that, after
multiple daily dosages of 20, 30, or 45 mg of AZD2171, biologically active
plasma concentrations are reached, sufficient for sustained VEGFR-1, -2, and -3
inhibition with subsequent effects on clinical parameters, for example, a clear
rise in blood pressure [23]. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetics of AZD2171 was not
affected by coadministration of gefitinib (van Cruijsen et al., Proceedings of the
41st annual meeting of the
American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2005). Rather than by these
pharmacodynamic or kinetic considerations, the lack of effect on PBDC
frequencies of VEGFRTK inhibition in our study may be explained by the
advanced disease state of the participating patients, which likely resulted in
a redundancy of DC suppressive factors. Besides
VEGF, other cytokines secreted by tumor cells are involved in the inhibition of
DC differentiation and maturation, among others are IL-6, IL-10, and M-CSF [27-29]. These other soluble tumor-derived factors may thus
overrule the potentially beneficial effect of VEGFR signaling blockade,
particularly in late stages of cancer development, which are associated with
relatively high systemic levels of these suppressive factors. VEGF may also
exert its effect on DC differentiation via another mechanism unlike phosphorylation of VEGFR
on DC [30, 31]. A small trial using bevacizumab (a monoclonal antibody binding and
neutralizing VEGF) in combination with chemotherapy did report improved DC
frequencies after treatment [3]. These results, which are in contrast to our
findings using AZD2171, a TKI of VEGFR, might indicate an indirect,
TK-independent effect of VEGF on DC differentiation.Although we did not observe an effect of VEGFRTK inhibition on PBDC
precursors and subsets in cancerpatients, the frequencies of accumulated MSCs
tended to decrease after AZD2171 treatment.
This CD14+HLA-DRneg/low MSC population may be the human equivalent of CD11b+ and Gr-1
myeloid suppressive cells identified in mice [32, 33], and we hypothesized that
tumor-derived VEGF might have skewed the hematopoiesis towards an expansion of
these myeloid cells with immunosuppressive traits. In mice, this scarce
population of immunosuppressive cells could be increased by tumor-derived
factors while neutralizing VEGF-antibodies inhibited expansion of this myeloid
subset [34]. Reduction of MSC in murine models has been shown to facilitate the
rejection of established metastatic disease [35]. It is notable, in this regard,
that both the two patients with high pretreatment MSC frequencies, which
normalized upon VEGFR TKI administration, had a minor clinical response. One of
these also showed a simultaneous increase in pMDC to normal levels. However,
due to the nature and size of this Phase I trial, these clinical observations
remained anecdotal.Ideally, phenotypic analyses of MSC and PBDC precursors and subsets
should be accompanied by functional assays. Large volumes of blood would have
been needed to evaluate the effect of AZD2171 on PBDC function, which made this
an unfeasible approach in the current setting. Additional in vitro studies are, therefore,
ongoing to assess the effect of VEGFRTK inhibition on DC and MSC
differentiation and functionality.In conclusion, our results indicate that advanced cancerpatients harbor
increased immature myeloid DC precursor and MSC frequencies, both with
potential immunosuppressive effects, as well as reduced MDC and PDC frequencies
in their circulation. VEGFRTK inhibition by AZD2171 with antiangiogenic and
preliminary anticancer effects did not appear to change any of these DC
(precursor) frequencies, although a trend was observed towards reduced MSC
frequencies. Our results support the idea that tumor-induced inhibition of DC
differentiation is systemic and most likely caused by multiple factors.
Clinical approaches to reverse this process should, therefore, encompass
systemic blockade of additional tumor-derived immunosuppressive cytokines
besides VEGF.
Authors: D I Gabrilovich; H L Chen; K R Girgis; H T Cunningham; G M Meny; S Nadaf; D Kavanaugh; D P Carbone Journal: Nat Med Date: 1996-10 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: N Boissel; P Rousselot; E Raffoux; J-M Cayuela; O Maarek; D Charron; L Degos; H Dombret; A Toubert; D Rea Journal: Leukemia Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Herbert Hurwitz; Louis Fehrenbacher; William Novotny; Thomas Cartwright; John Hainsworth; William Heim; Jordan Berlin; Ari Baron; Susan Griffing; Eric Holmgren; Napoleone Ferrara; Gwen Fyfe; Beth Rogers; Robert Ross; Fairooz Kabbinavar Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-06-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S Della Bella; M Gennaro; M Vaccari; C Ferraris; S Nicola; A Riva; M Clerici; M Greco; M L Villa Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2003-10-20 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Anamika Bose; Jennifer L Taylor; Sean Alber; Simon C Watkins; Jorge A Garcia; Brian I Rini; Jennifer S Ko; Peter A Cohen; James H Finke; Walter J Storkus Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Johnny Kao; Eric C Ko; Samuel Eisenstein; Andrew G Sikora; Shibo Fu; Shu-Hsia Chen Journal: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol Date: 2010-03-20 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Saskia Jam Santegoets; Anita Gm Stam; Sinéad M Lougheed; Helen Gall; Karin Jooss; Natalie Sacks; Kristen Hege; Israel Lowy; Rik J Scheper; Winald R Gerritsen; Alfons Jm van den Eertwegh; Tanja D de Gruijl Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2014-09-16 Impact factor: 13.751