Literature DB >> 18319093

Ultrasound detection of submerged dental implants through soft tissue in a porcine model.

Martin O Culjat1, Mijin Choi, Rahul S Singh, Warren S Grundfest, Elliott R Brown, Shane N White.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Current methods of measuring soft tissue thickness over potential dental implant sites and locating submerged implants may be imprecise or invasive.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop and demonstrate proof of the concept of a customized ultrasound imaging system in locating and measuring the depth of implants submerged beneath soft tissue.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A complete ultrasound system, including a customized soft tissue-matched transducer, transceiver, and digital signal processing algorithms, was created for the specific application of detecting dental implants anchored in bone beneath soft tissue. The system was used to locate implants placed in cancellous bone and measure overlying soft tissue depth in a porcine model. Ten measurements were made on each porcine model by manually moving the transducer laterally over the soft tissue surface. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: The mean signal-to-noise ratio, SNR (standard deviation), from the bone surfaces, was 19.1 (4.6) dB, and the mean SNR from the implant surfaces was 36.6 (2.2) dB, resulting in a mean difference of 17.5 dB, or x56.2, in average signal power between the bone and implant surfaces. Consequently, implants were easily and accurately (+/-0.2 mm) located beneath at least 5 mm of soft tissue. Likewise, soft tissue depths over bone and implants were accurately measured and were within the corresponding caliper tissue measurement error (+/-0.5 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: The specialized ultrasound imaging system located and measured the depth of implants placed in bone submerged beneath soft tissue in a porcine model.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18319093     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60046-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  6 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in imaging technologies in dentistry.

Authors:  Naseem Shah; Nikhil Bansal; Ajay Logani
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-10-28

2.  Updates on ultrasound research in implant dentistry: a systematic review of potential clinical indications.

Authors:  Vaishnavi Bhaskar; Hsun-Liang Chan; Mark MacEachern; Oliver D Kripfgans
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Ultrasonographically locating the mental foramen and its soft tissue relations.

Authors:  Abdullah E Laher; Mike Wells
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Ultrasonography for diagnosis of peri-implant diseases and conditions: a detailed scanning protocol and case demonstration.

Authors:  Hsun-Liang Chan; Oliver D Kripfgans
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  In vivo ultrasonic detection of polyurea crosslinked silica aerogel implants.

Authors:  Firouzeh Sabri; Merry E Sebelik; Ryan Meacham; John D Boughter; Mitchell J Challis; Nicholas Leventis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Accuracy of high-resolution ultrasound (US) for gingival soft tissue thickness mesurement in edentulous patients prior to implant placement.

Authors:  Gül Sönmez; Kıvanç Kamburoğlu; Ayşe Gülşahı
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.525

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.