Literature DB >> 18318611

Separating color from color contrast.

Arthur G Shapiro1.   

Abstract

Visual objects can be described by their color and by their color contrast. For example, a red disk in front of a white background appears "red with high color contrast," whereas a red disk in front of a slightly less-saturated red background will appear "red with low color contrast." This paper examines the visual response to color contrast in a cone-based color space. The stimulus consists of two disks whose chromaticity and/or luminance modulate in time along a line in a DKL color space; the chromaticity and luminance levels of the two disks are always identical. One disk is surrounded by a static ring whose color is at one end of the color line, and the other disk is surrounded by a static ring whose color is at the opposite end of the color line. The disks appear to modulate in antiphase (following the contrast information), yet they can also appear to be approximately the same color (following the chromatic/luminance information). The observers' task was to adjust the color angle of modulating disks until the antiphase appearance was eliminated-creating a contrast null. Observers set contrast nulls at a color angle approximately 90 deg away from the line connecting the colors of the surround rings; this result occurred in both chromoluminant and equiluminant color planes, although two observers showed a flattening near equiluminance in the chromoluminance planes. To account for the data, I present a model that contains one pathway for color and another pathway for color contrast. I show that (1) the model correctly predicts orthogonal directions in color space for the contrast nulling task; (2) the response of the contrast pathway appears to be faster than the response of the color pathway; (3) the response of the contrast pathway may mediate detection thresholds under some conditions (a finding that can account for some of the effects of surround luminance on temporal sensitivity); (4) the asynchronous modulation can be seen even when the stimulus is blurred; and (5) the asynchrony does not require a disk-ring configuration.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18318611     DOI: 10.1167/8.1.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  7 in total

1.  Slow updating of the achromatic point after a change in illumination.

Authors:  Robert J Lee; Kathryn A Dawson; Hannah E Smithson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Changes in perceived temporal variation due to context: contributions from two distinct neural mechanisms.

Authors:  Anthony D D'Antona; Jan Kremers; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Separating monocular and binocular neural mechanisms mediating chromatic contextual interactions.

Authors:  Anthony D D'Antona; Jens H Christiansen; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Color strategies for object identification.

Authors:  Qasim Zaidi; Marques Bostic
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  A first- and second-order motion energy analysis of peripheral motion illusions leads to further evidence of "feature blur" in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Arthur G Shapiro; Emily J Knight; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Emergence of crowding: The role of contrast and orientation salience.

Authors:  Robert J Lee; Josephine Reuther; Ramakrishna Chakravarthi; Jasna Martinovic
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Bioplausible multiscale filtering in retino-cortical processing as a mechanism in perceptual grouping.

Authors:  Nasim Nematzadeh; David M W Powers; Trent W Lewis
Journal:  Brain Inform       Date:  2017-09-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.