Literature DB >> 18318087

Measuring competence in endoscopic sinus surgery.

J Syme-Grant1, P S White, J P G McAleer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Competence based education is currently being introduced into higher surgical training in the UK. Valid and reliable performance assessment tools are essential to ensure competencies are achieved. No such tools have yet been reported in the UK literature.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop and pilot test an Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Competence Assessment Tool (ESSCAT). The ESSCAT was designed for in-theatre assessment of higher surgical trainees in the UK.
METHODS: The ESSCAT rating matrix was developed through task analysis of ESS procedures. All otolaryngology consultants and specialist registrars in Scotland were given the opportunity to contribute to its refinement. Two cycles of in-theatre testing were used to ensure utility and gather quantitative data on validity and reliability. Videos of trainees performing surgery were used in establishing inter-rater reliability.
RESULTS: National consultation, the consensus derived minimum standard of performance, Cronbach's alpha = 0.89 and demonstration of trainee learning (p = 0.027) during the in vivo application of the ESSCAT suggest a high level of validity. Inter-rater reliability was moderate for competence decisions (Cohen's Kappa = 0.5) and good for total scores (Intra-Class Correlation Co-efficient = 0.63). Intra-rater reliability was good for both competence decisions (Kappa = 0.67) and total scores (Kendall's Tau-b = 0.73).
CONCLUSION: The ESSCAT generates a valid and reliable assessment of trainees' in-theatre performance of endoscopic sinus surgery. In conjunction with ongoing evaluation of the instrument we recommend the use of the ESSCAT in higher specialist training in otolaryngology in the UK.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18318087     DOI: 10.1016/s1479-666x(08)80093-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgeon        ISSN: 1479-666X            Impact factor:   2.392


  6 in total

Review 1.  Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Rainer K Weber; Werner Hosemann
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

Review 2.  Danger points, complications and medico-legal aspects in endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  W Hosemann; C Draf
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-13

3.  Assessment of Factors Associated With Internal Carotid Injury in Expanded Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  Abdulaziz AlQahtani; Nyall R London; Paolo Castelnuovo; Davide Locatelli; Aldo Stamm; Aaron A Cohen-Gadol; Hussam Elbosraty; Roy Casiano; Jacques Morcos; Ernesto Pasquini; Georgio Frank; Diego Mazzatenta; Garni Barkhoudarian; Chester Griffiths; Daniel Kelly; Christos Georgalas; Narayanan Janakiram; Piero Nicolai; Daniel M Prevedello; Ricardo L Carrau
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 6.223

4.  On Rating Angels: The Halo Effect and Straight Line Scoring.

Authors:  Jonathan Sherbino; Geoff Norman
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2017-12

5.  Video-based method of quantifying performance and instrument motion during simulated phonosurgery.

Authors:  Ellen Conroy; Ketan Surender; Zhixian Geng; Ting Chen; Seth Dailey; Jack Jiang
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Experience with key indicator cases among otolaryngology residents.

Authors:  Daniel C O'Brien; Brian Kellermeyer; Jeffson Chung; Michele M Carr
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-07-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.