Literature DB >> 18317761

Population pharmacokinetics of aprepitant and dexamethasone in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Susumu Nakade1, Tomoya Ohno, Junsaku Kitagawa, Yoshitaka Hashimoto, Masahiro Katayama, Hiroshi Awata, Yasuo Kodama, Yasuyuki Miyata.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a population pharmacokinetic model of aprepitant and dexamethasone in Japanese patients with cancer, explore the factors that affect the pharmacokinetics of aprepitant, and evaluate the effect of aprepitant on the clearance of intravenous dexamethasone.
METHODS: A total of 897 aprepitant concentration measurements were obtained from 290 cancer patients and 25 healthy volunteers. For dexamethasone, a total of 847 measurements were obtained from 440 patients who were co-administered aprepitant (40, 125 mg, or placebo). Plasma concentration of aprepitant and dexamethasone were determined by liquid chromatography connected with a tandem mass spectrometer and analyzed by a population approach using NONMEM software.
RESULTS: The plasma concentration time course of aprepitant was described using a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and lag time. Oral clearance (CL/F) of aprepitant was changed by aprepitant dose at doses of 40 or 125 mg. Body weight was the most influential intrinsic factor to CL/F of aprepitant. Age, ALT, and BUN also had mild effects on the CL/F. Typical population estimates of CL/F, apparent distribution volume (V(d)/F), absorption constant (K(a)) and absorption lag time were 1.54 L/h, 72.1 L, 0.893/h and 0.295 h, respectively. Inter-individual variability in CL/F, V(d)/F and K(a) were 53.9, 21.0, and 141%, respectively; intra-individual variability was 27.7%. The plasma concentration time course of intravenous dexamethasone was also described using a one-compartment model. Clearance of dexamethasone was decreased 24.7 and 47.5% by co-administration of aprepitant 40 and 125 mg. All final model estimates of aprepitant and dexamethasone fell within 10% of the bootstrapped mean.
CONCLUSIONS: A pharmacokinetic model for aprepitant has been developed that incorporates body weight, age, ALT, BUN and aprepitant dose to predict the CL/F. The results of population pharmacokinetic analysis of dexamethasone support dose adjustment of dexamethasone in the case of co-administration with aprepitant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18317761     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-008-0713-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  14 in total

Review 1.  Aprepitant and fosaprepitant drug interactions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Priya Patel; J Steven Leeder; Micheline Piquette-Miller; L Lee Dupuis
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Effects of the NK1 antagonist, aprepitant, on response to oral and intranasal oxycodone in prescription opioid abusers.

Authors:  Sharon L Walsh; Markus Heilig; Paul A Nuzzo; Pam Henderson; Michelle R Lofwall
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 4.280

3.  Efficacy of aprepitant in preventing nausea and vomiting due to high-dose melphalan-based conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Masatoshi Sakurai; Takehiko Mori; Jun Kato; Yuya Koda; Taku Kikuchi; Sumiko Kohashi; Masuho Saburi; Takaaki Toyama; Yoshinobu Aisa; Tomonori Nakazato; Noriko Beppu; Soichiro Tsuda; Naoyuki Shigematsu; Shinichiro Okamoto
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 2.490

4.  Aprepitant in pediatric patients using moderate and highly emetogenic protocols: a systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Lucas Miyake Okumura; Fernanda D'Athayde Rodrigues; Maria Angelica Pires Ferreira; Leila Beltrami Moreira
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Aprepitant and fosaprepitant: a 10-year review of efficacy and safety.

Authors:  Matti Aapro; Alexandra Carides; Bernardo L Rapoport; Hans-Joachim Schmoll; Li Zhang; David Warr
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-03-20

6.  Evaluation of hepatic CYP3A enzyme activity using endogenous markers in lung cancer patients treated with cisplatin, dexamethasone, and aprepitant.

Authors:  Hideyuki Hibino; Naomi Sakiyama; Yoshinori Makino; Reiko Makihara-Ando; Hidehito Horinouchi; Yutaka Fujiwara; Shintaro Kanda; Yasushi Goto; Tatsuya Yoshida; Yusuke Okuma; Yuki Shinno; Shuji Murakami; Hironobu Hashimoto; Takeshi Akiyoshi; Ayuko Imaoka; Yuichiro Ohe; Masakazu Yamaguchi; Hisakazu Ohtani
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  The correlation between plasma aprepitant concentration and antiemetic effect in Japanese gastric or esophageal cancer patients.

Authors:  Kosuke Nishizawa; Hideaki Shimada; Masaaki Ito; Yoko Oshima; Satoshi Yajima; Yoshinori Kikuchi; Yasukiyo Sumino; Hironori Kaneko; Kenji Nishizawa; Masahiko Obayashi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Encouraging the move towards predictive population models for the obese using propofol as a motivating example.

Authors:  Sarah C McLeay; Glynn A Morrish; Carl M Kirkpatrick; Bruce Green
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 4.200

9.  Effect of dexamethasone on extracellular secretion of cystatin C in cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Chika Yamawaki; Minoru Takahashi; Kohji Takara; Manabu Kume; Midori Hirai; Hiroyuki Yasui; Tsutomu Nakamura
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2012-10-15

10.  Pharmacokinetics of aprepitant and dexamethasone after administration of chemotherapeutic agents and effects of plasma substance P concentration on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in Japanese cancer patients.

Authors:  Toshiaki Takahashi; Yukiko Nakamura; Asuka Tsuya; Haruyasu Murakami; Masahiro Endo; Nobuyuki Yamamoto
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.