Literature DB >> 18317679

The search for a balance between short and long-term treatment outcomes in multiple sclerosis.

Ulf Baumhackl1.   

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis is a lifelong, immune-mediated progressive disorder. The early age of onset and the chronic nature of the disease with accumulation of physical disability, demand a long-term ("lifelong") management, including disease-modifying immunomodulatory therapies and symptomatic treatments. The ultimate goal in the long-term management of multiple sclerosis is to prevent or delay the appearance of permanent neurological disability. Due to improvements in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis, it is now possible to initiate treatment early in the disease process. To this end, first-line immunomodulatory treatments such as glatiramer acetate and beta-interferons are available that reduce the rate of relapses and disease activity as measured with magnetic resonance imaging. However, the short duration of clinical trials provides little information about long-term changes in disability over time. In the case of glatiramer acetate, a long-term, openlabel extension of the pivotal trial has provided prospective data on systematic regular follow-up of all patients who had ever received the drug during the original trial or its extension. Of 232 patients analysed, 108 were still participating in the study an average of ten years after treatment was initiated. Despite the limitations of open-label trials, this study has provided some evidence for a sustained reduction in frequency and severity of relapses and in the rate of accrual of disability. Such long-term data, which demonstrate safety, tolerability and sustained clinical benefit, help improve patient care and may contribute to patients taking a more positive view of treatment. Effective immunomodulatory treatment needs comprehensive information and education of the patient to establish long-term adherence, a critical determinant of long-term outcome. A multidisciplinary approach through a health care team is the optimal strategy, with encouragement to continue the therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18317679     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-008-1010-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  26 in total

1.  Neurologic consequence of delaying glatiramer acetate therapy for multiple sclerosis: 8-year data.

Authors:  K P Johnson; C C Ford; R P Lisak; J S Wolinsky
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.209

2.  Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey. National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  F D Lublin; S C Reingold
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  European/Canadian multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the effects of glatiramer acetate on magnetic resonance imaging--measured disease activity and burden in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. European/Canadian Glatiramer Acetate Study Group.

Authors:  G Comi; M Filippi; J S Wolinsky
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 10.422

4.  Sustained clinical benefits of glatiramer acetate in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients observed for 6 years. Copolymer 1 Multiple Sclerosis Study Group.

Authors:  K P Johnson; B R Brooks; C C Ford; A Goodman; J Guarnaccia; R P Lisak; L W Myers; H S Panitch; A Pruitt; J W Rose; N Kachuck; J S Wolinsky
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.312

5.  Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study of interferon beta-1a in relapsing/remitting multiple sclerosis. PRISMS (Prevention of Relapses and Disability by Interferon beta-1a Subcutaneously in Multiple Sclerosis) Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-11-07       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  A comparison of the benefits of mitoxantrone and other recent therapeutic approaches in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Richard E Gonsette
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.889

Review 7.  The natural history of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  B G Weinshenker
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.806

8.  Intramuscular interferon beta-1a for disease progression in relapsing multiple sclerosis. The Multiple Sclerosis Collaborative Research Group (MSCRG)

Authors:  L D Jacobs; D L Cookfair; R A Rudick; R M Herndon; J R Richert; A M Salazar; J S Fischer; D E Goodkin; C V Granger; J H Simon; J J Alam; D M Bartoszak; D N Bourdette; J Braiman; C M Brownscheidle; M E Coats; S L Cohan; D S Dougherty; R P Kinkel; M K Mass; F E Munschauer; R L Priore; P M Pullicino; B J Scherokman; R H Whitham
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 10.422

9.  The Mayo Clinic-Canadian Cooperative trial of sulfasalazine in active multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  J H Noseworthy; P O'Brien; B J Erickson; D Lee; D Sneve; G C Ebers; G P Rice; A Auty; W J Hader; A Kirk; P Duquette; J Carter; G Francis; L Metz; E Shuster
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W I McDonald; A Compston; G Edan; D Goodkin; H P Hartung; F D Lublin; H F McFarland; D W Paty; C H Polman; S C Reingold; M Sandberg-Wollheim; W Sibley; A Thompson; S van den Noort; B Y Weinshenker; J S Wolinsky
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 10.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.