Literature DB >> 18317496

The evolution of midurethral slings.

David E Rapp1, Kathleen C Kobashi.   

Abstract

Use of urethral slings in the treatment of incontinence started in the early 20th century. An evolution in understanding the pathogenesis of urinary incontinence led to development of the midurethral sling, which was designed to replace the natural suburethral vectors of support, as described in the integral theory. Since the introduction of tension-free vaginal tape in 1995, multiple other commercially available types of midurethral sling have been introduced. In general, these sling types share the common characteristics of using a thin, type I synthetic mesh inserted at a midurethral level and applied without tension. The midurethral sling procedure has subsequently undergone multiple technical modifications, predominantly alterations to the technique and route used for sling insertion. Despite the variety in techniques, available evidence suggests that all sling types provide efficacious and durable outcomes. Several adverse effects have been reported that are specific to certain techniques, and include the risk of vascular, enteric or nerve injury, lower urinary tract injury, urinary retention or voiding dysfunction, and vaginal erosion. Nonetheless, the midurethral sling provides a safe surgical option overall, and represents a notable advance in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18317496     DOI: 10.1038/ncpuro1052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol        ISSN: 1743-4270


  12 in total

1.  Dramatic increase (1997-2007) in the number of procedures for stress urinary incontinence in Belgium.

Authors:  Hendrik Cammu; Freya Saeys; Patrick Haentjens
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Incontinence: Evaluation of a midurethral single incision sling.

Authors:  Ashley King; David E Rapp
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Surgery for stress urinary incontinence in Finland 1987-2009.

Authors:  Kaisa Kurkijärvi; Riikka Aaltonen; Mika Gissler; Juha Mäkinen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Bone-anchored suburethral sling: surgical technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Alvaro Lucioni; Kathleen C Kobashi
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  The autologous fascia pubovaginal sling for complicated female stress incontinence.

Authors:  Blayne K Welk; Sender Herschorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Clinical impact of body mass index on the outcome of the SPARC-sling system for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Badereddinn Mohamad Al-Ali; Georg C Hutterer; Erika Puchwein; Karl Pummer; Giacomo Novara; Günter Primus
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-12-04       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Animal models of stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Hai-Hong Jiang; Margot S Damaser
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2011

8.  A modified Altis® mid-urethral sling that allows immediate post-operative adjustment: experience in 197 patients.

Authors:  Brett J Friedman; Jennifer Nguyen; Annah Vollstedt; Mireya Diaz; Ly Hoang Roberts; Larry T Sirls
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 9.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of Macroplastique for treating female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Gamal M Ghoniem; Christopher J Miller
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Is modified Raz technique of midurethral sling a reliable and cost-effective method of treating stress urinary incontinence?

Authors:  Rakesh Kapoor; Ruchir Maheshwari; Deepa Kapoor; Uday P Singh; Rohit Upadhyay
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2011-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.