CONTEXT: Although the sex difference in eating disorder prevalence has typically been attributed to psychosocial factors, biological factors may also play a role. Prenatal testosterone exposure is a promising candidate, since it masculinizes behavior in animals and humans via its permanent effects on the central nervous system. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether in utero testosterone exposure has masculinizing effects on disordered eating (DE) by comparing opposite-sex (OS) and same-sex (SS) twins. Twin type (SS vs OS) is considered a proxy measure of prenatal hormone exposure, since females from OS pairs are exposed to more testosterone in utero than females from SS pairs. A linear trend in mean levels of DE was predicted based on expected prenatal testosterone exposure, with SS female twins exhibiting the highest levels of DE followed by OS female twins, OS male twins, and SS male twins. DESIGN: A twin study comparison of OS vs SS twins. SETTING: Michigan State University Twin Registry. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included 304 SS female twins, 59 OS female twins, 54 OS male twins, and 165 SS male twins. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Overall levels of DE were assessed with the Minnesota Eating Behavior Survey. RESULTS: Confirming hypotheses, DE exhibited significant linear trends, with SS female twins exhibiting the highest levels of DE followed by OS female twins, OS male twins, and SS male twins. This linear trend could not be accounted for by levels of anxiety or socialization effects. Indeed, OS female twins exhibited lower levels of DE compared with an independent sample of undergraduate women (n = 69) who were raised with 1 or more brothers. CONCLUSIONS: The masculinization of DE in OS female twins is unlikely to be due to socialization effects alone. Biological factors, such as the masculinization of the central nervous system by prenatal testosterone exposure, may also contribute to sex differences in DE prevalence.
CONTEXT: Although the sex difference in eating disorder prevalence has typically been attributed to psychosocial factors, biological factors may also play a role. Prenatal testosterone exposure is a promising candidate, since it masculinizes behavior in animals and humans via its permanent effects on the central nervous system. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether in utero testosterone exposure has masculinizing effects on disordered eating (DE) by comparing opposite-sex (OS) and same-sex (SS) twins. Twin type (SS vs OS) is considered a proxy measure of prenatal hormone exposure, since females from OS pairs are exposed to more testosterone in utero than females from SS pairs. A linear trend in mean levels of DE was predicted based on expected prenatal testosterone exposure, with SS female twins exhibiting the highest levels of DE followed by OS female twins, OS male twins, and SS male twins. DESIGN: A twin study comparison of OS vs SS twins. SETTING: Michigan State University Twin Registry. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included 304 SS female twins, 59 OS female twins, 54 OS male twins, and 165 SS male twins. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Overall levels of DE were assessed with the Minnesota Eating Behavior Survey. RESULTS: Confirming hypotheses, DE exhibited significant linear trends, with SS female twins exhibiting the highest levels of DE followed by OS female twins, OS male twins, and SS male twins. This linear trend could not be accounted for by levels of anxiety or socialization effects. Indeed, OS female twins exhibited lower levels of DE compared with an independent sample of undergraduate women (n = 69) who were raised with 1 or more brothers. CONCLUSIONS: The masculinization of DE in OS female twins is unlikely to be due to socialization effects alone. Biological factors, such as the masculinization of the central nervous system by prenatal testosterone exposure, may also contribute to sex differences in DE prevalence.
Authors: Jill B Becker; Arthur P Arnold; Karen J Berkley; Jeffrey D Blaustein; Lisa A Eckel; Elizabeth Hampson; James P Herman; Sherry Marts; Wolfgang Sadee; Meir Steiner; Jane Taylor; Elizabeth Young Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2004-12-23 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Paul A M Smeets; Cees de Graaf; Annette Stafleu; Matthias J P van Osch; Rutger A J Nievelstein; Jeroen van der Grond Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Ruth H Striegel-Moore; Faith A Dohm; Helena C Kraemer; C Barr Taylor; Stephen Daniels; Patricia B Crawford; George B Schreiber Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Celina C C Cohen-Bendahan; Jan K Buitelaar; Stephanie H M van Goozen; Peggy T Cohen-Kettenis Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Laura N Vandenberg; Theo Colborn; Tyrone B Hayes; Jerrold J Heindel; David R Jacobs; Duk-Hee Lee; Toshi Shioda; Ana M Soto; Frederick S vom Saal; Wade V Welshons; R Thomas Zoeller; John Peterson Myers Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 19.871
Authors: Jessica L Suisman; Shannon M O'Connor; Steffanie Sperry; J Kevin Thompson; Pamela K Keel; S Alexandra Burt; Michael Neale; Steven Boker; Cheryl Sisk; Kelly L Klump Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2012-10-03 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Kelly L Klump; S Alexandra Burt; Alexia Spanos; Matt McGue; William G Iacono; Tracey D Wade Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 4.861