Literature DB >> 18316547

U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval: panitumumab for epidermal growth factor receptor-expressing metastatic colorectal carcinoma with progression following fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-containing chemotherapy regimens.

Ruthann M Giusti1, Kaushikkumar Shastri, Anne M Pilaro, Chana Fuchs, Ruth Cordoba-Rodriguez, Kallappa Koti, Mark Rothmann, Angela Yuxin Men, Hong Zhao, Monica Hughes, Patricia Keegan, Karen D Weiss, Richard Pazdur.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the Food and Drug Administration review and marketing approval considerations for panitumumab (Vectibix) for the third-line treatment of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-expressing metastatic colorectal carcinoma. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Food and Drug Administration reviewed a single, open-label, multicenter trial in which 463 patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer who had progressed on or following treatment with a regimen containing a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan were randomized (1:1) to receive best supportive care (BSC) with or without panitumumab (6 mg/kg every other week) administered until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Progression and response were confirmed by an independent review committee masked to treatment assignment. At progression, patients in the BSC-alone arm were eligible to receive panitumumab.
RESULTS: Although median progression-free survival (PFS) was similar in both treatment arms ( approximately 8 weeks), the mean PFS was approximately 50% longer among patients receiving panitumumab than among those receiving BSC alone (96 versus 60 days, respectively) and the objective response rate in patients receiving panitumumab was 8%. However, no difference in overall survival was shown between the two study arms.
CONCLUSIONS: Panitumumab received accelerated approval based on improvement in PFS and an independently confirmed response rate of 8%, similar to that observed with other active agents at this advanced stage of disease. Confirmation of clinical benefit will be required for full approval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18316547     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  28 in total

Review 1.  Pulmonary toxicities from targeted therapies: a review.

Authors:  Nicholas A Barber; Apar Kishor Ganti
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 2.  Understanding resistance to EGFR inhibitors-impact on future treatment strategies.

Authors:  Deric L Wheeler; Emily F Dunn; Paul M Harari
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  A Review of Monoclonal Antibody-Based Treatments in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Yunes Panahi; Amir Hossein Mohammadzadeh; Behzad Behnam; Hossein M Orafai; Tannaz Jamialahmadi; Amirhossein Sahebkar
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Lipid raft localization of EGFR alters the response of cancer cells to the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib.

Authors:  Mary E Irwin; Kelly L Mueller; Natacha Bohin; Yubin Ge; Julie L Boerner
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 5.  Trial watch: Tumor-targeting monoclonal antibodies for oncological indications.

Authors:  Erika Vacchelli; Jonathan Pol; Norma Bloy; Alexander Eggermont; Isabelle Cremer; Wolf Hervé Fridman; Jérôme Galon; Aurélien Marabelle; Holbrook Kohrt; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 8.110

6.  Anti-EGFR therapeutic efficacy correlates directly with inhibition of STAT3 activity.

Authors:  Nelson Ung; Tracy L Putoczki; Stanley S Stylli; Irvin Ng; John M Mariadason; Timothy A Chan; Hong-Jian Zhu; Rodney B Luwor
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 7.  Clinical relevance of KRAS in human cancers.

Authors:  Sylwia Jancík; Jirí Drábek; Danuta Radzioch; Marián Hajdúch
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-06-07

8.  Markedly enhanced permeability and retention effects induced by photo-immunotherapy of tumors.

Authors:  Kohei Sano; Takahito Nakajima; Peter L Choyke; Hisataka Kobayashi
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 9.  PharmGKB summary: very important pharmacogene information for the epidermal growth factor receptor.

Authors:  Ugur Hodoglugil; Michelle W Carrillo; Joan M Hebert; Niki Karachaliou; Rafael C Rosell; Russ B Altman; Teri E Klein
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Prognostic and predictive value of TOPK stratified by KRAS and BRAF gene alterations in sporadic, hereditary and metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  I Zlobec; F Molinari; M Kovac; M P Bihl; H J Altermatt; J Diebold; H Frick; M Germer; M Horcic; M Montani; G Singer; H Yurtsever; A Zettl; L Terracciano; L Mazzucchelli; P Saletti; M Frattini; K Heinimann; A Lugli
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.