Literature DB >> 18316338

Predictors of response to anti-TNF therapy according to ACR and EULAR criteria in patients with established RA: results from the South Swedish Arthritis Treatment Group Register.

L E Kristensen1, M C Kapetanovic, A Gülfe, M Söderlin, T Saxne, P Geborek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors predicting response to first TNF blocking treatment course in patients with established RA with a special focus on gender differences.
METHODS: Patients with active RA initiating their first treatment course of TNF-blocking therapy were enrolled. The study period was March 1999 through September 2006. The prospective protocol included information on demographics, clinical characteristics of patients and response measures. Fulfilment of ACR 50-70% improvement and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) good response or remission [28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) <2.6] at 3 months were chosen as primary outcome measures. Potential predictors of responses were identified using multivariate binary logistic regression models.
RESULTS: In total, 1565 patients were included in the study. Gender did not influence treatment response. Consistently, concomitant methotrexate (MTX) was significantly associated with EULAR remission, EULAR good response, ACR50 response and ACR70 response with odds ratios (ORs) 1.97, 2.13, 2.10 and 1.75, respectively. Concurrent treatment with other DMARDs was also significantly associated with EULAR remission, EULAR good response and ACR50 response (OR: 1.96, 2.24 and 1.94, respectively). Likewise, low HAQ at baseline consistently predicted good clinical outcome. Disease activity at baseline was directly associated with favourable response when measured by ACR50 and ACR70 (OR: 1.59 and 1.60, respectively), whereas DAS28 score at baseline was inversely associated with EULAR remission (OR: 0.78).
CONCLUSIONS: In this observational study of patients with established RA, gender did not predict response to anti-TNF therapy, whereas treatment with concomitant DMARDs, especially MTX and low disability were associated with good response. Choice of outcome measures may influence the predictive value of baseline features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18316338     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  42 in total

1.  The good EULAR response at the first year is strongly predictive of clinical remission in rheumatoid arthritis: results from the TARAC cohort.

Authors:  Budsakorn Darawankul; Sumapa Chaiamnuay; Rattapol Pakchotanon; Paijit Asavatanabodee; Pongthorn Narongroeknawin
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  HAQ score is an independent predictor of sustained remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Kyung-Eun Lee; Sung-Eun Choi; Haimuzi Xu; Ji-Hyoun Kang; Dong-Jin Park; Shin-Seok Lee
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 3.  Biologics registers in RA: methodological aspects, current role and future applications.

Authors:  Elena Nikiphorou; Maya H Buch; Kimme L Hyrich
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 20.543

4.  Comparative effectiveness and predictors of response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitor therapies in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Helena Canhão; Ana Maria Rodrigues; Ana Filipa Mourão; Fernando Martins; Maria José Santos; José Canas-Silva; Joaquim Polido-Pereira; José Alberto Pereira Silva; José António Costa; Domingos Araújo; Cândida Silva; Helena Santos; Cátia Duarte; José Antonio Pereira da Silva; Fernando M Pimentel-Santos; Jaime Cunha Branco; Elizabeth W Karlson; João Eurico Fonseca; Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 7.580

5.  Slit3 inhibits Robo3-induced invasion of synovial fibroblasts in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Alexandra E Denk; Simone Kaufmann; Klaus Stark; Jörg Schedel; Torsten Lowin; Thomas Schubert; Anja K Bosserhoff
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 5.156

Review 6.  Sex and Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Ennio Giulio Favalli; Martina Biggioggero; Chiara Crotti; Andrea Becciolini; Maria Gabriella Raimondo; Pier Luigi Meroni
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 7.  Defining remission in rheumatoid arthritis: results of an initial American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism consensus conference.

Authors:  Lilian H D van Tuyl; Steven C Vlad; David T Felson; George Wells; Maarten Boers
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2009-05-15

8.  Long-term etanercept retention patterns and factors associated with treatment discontinuation: a retrospective cohort study using Canadian claims-level data.

Authors:  Majed Khraishi; Jelena Ivanovic; Yvonne Zhang; Brad Millson; Marie-Josee Brabant; Katia Charland; John Woolcott; Heather Jones
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Benefit of anti-TNF therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients with moderate disease activity.

Authors:  Kimme L Hyrich; Chris Deighton; Kath D Watson; Deborah P M Symmons; Mark Lunt
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 7.580

10.  Efficacy and safety of anti-TNF therapies in psoriatic arthritis: an observational study from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register.

Authors:  Amr A Saad; Darren M Ashcroft; Kath D Watson; Deborah P M Symmons; Peter R Noyce; Kimme L Hyrich
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 7.580

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.