Literature DB >> 18315472

Efficacy of an alpha1 blocker in expulsive therapy of lower ureteral stones.

Chung-Jing Wang1, Shi-Wei Huang, Chien-Hsing Chang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical role of an alpha(1a-1d)-specific blocker in the medical expulsive therapy of symptomatic lower ureteral stones.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was carried out from May 2005 to December 2006 and involved 95 patients. All patients, who had symptomatic lower ureteral stones <10 mm diameter, were enrolled in this prospective study, and were randomly divided into three groups using the statistical software programs Plus 1.0 and Plus 2.10. Group 1 (32 patients) received tamsulosin (0.4 mg daily), group 2 (32 patients) received terazosin (2 mg daily), group 3 (31 patients) acted as controls. All patients were diagnosed with x-rays of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder, urinary ultrasonography, and intravenous urography. All patients received the same analgesic regimen and sublingual buprenorphine on demand. The number of colic episodes, lower urinary tract symptoms, analgesic dosages, and the number of days required for spontaneous passage of the stones were all recorded in a diary.
RESULTS: Expulsion was observed in 26 of 32 patients in group 1 (81%), 25 of 32 in group 2 (78%), and 17 of 31 in group 3 (55%). The average expulsion time for groups 1, 2, and 3 were 6.3, 6.3, and 10.1 days, respectively. Mean analgesic dosage per patient in groups 1, 2, and 3 were 231, 256, and 347 mg, respectively. A statistically significant difference was observed between groups 1 and 2 with respect to group 3 for all three of these parameters. Adverse effects were also seen in 5 of 32 patients in group 2 (16%), a statistically significant difference with regard to groups 1 and 3.
CONCLUSIONS: Medical treatment with alpha(1a-1d)-blocker proved to be safe and effective as demonstrated by the increased stone expulsion rate and reduced expulsion time, as well as the need for analgesics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18315472     DOI: 10.1089/end.2007.0133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  26 in total

1.  Evaluation of the efficiency of tamsulosin and Rowatinex in patients with distal ureteral stones: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Mustafa Aldemir; Yusuf Emre Uçgül; Onder Kayıgil
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Efficacy and safety of silodosin in the medical expulsion therapy for distal ureteral calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Peng Xue; Huantao Zong; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones.

Authors:  Vassilios Tzortzis; Charalampos Mamoulakis; Jorge Rioja; Stavros Gravas; Martin C Michel; Jean J M C H de la Rosette
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Comparing the efficacy of tamsulosin and silodosin in the medical expulsion therapy for ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Sandeep Gupta; Bijit Lodh; Akoijam Kaku Singh; Khumukcham Somarendra; Kangjam Sholay Meitei; Sinam Rajendra Singh
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-08-01

5.  Role of combined use of potassium citrate and tamsulosin in the management of uric acid distal ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Osama El-Gamal; Mohamed El-Bendary; Maged Ragab; Mohamed Rasheed
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-08-21

Review 6.  Kidney stones.

Authors:  Ranan Dasgupta; Jonathan Glass; Jonathon Olsburgh
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2009-04-21

7.  Association of spontaneous expulsion with C-reactive protein and other clinico-demographic factors in patients with lower ureteric stone.

Authors:  Amit Jain; Sreerag Kodakkattil Sreenivasan; Ramanitharan Manikandan; Lalgudi Narayanan Dorairajan; Sujatha Sistla; Subathra Adithan
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Comparative evaluation of efficacy of use of naftopidil and/or celecoxib for medical treatment of distal ureteral stones.

Authors:  Jian Lin Lv; Qing Lai Tang
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Comparing efficacy of α1D-receptor antagonist naftopidil and α1A/D-receptor antagonist tamsulosin in management of distal ureteral stones.

Authors:  Shui Gen Zhou; Jian Lin Lu; Ju Hong Hui
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Ten-year experience in the management of distal ureteral stones greater than 10 mm in size.

Authors:  L Dell'Atti; Sergio Papa
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.