Literature DB >> 18315407

How does bilingualism improve executive control? A comparison of active and reactive inhibition mechanisms.

Lorenza S Colzato1, Maria Teresa Bajo, Wery van den Wildenberg, Daniela Paolieri, Sander Nieuwenhuis, Wido La Heij, Bernhard Hommel.   

Abstract

It has been claimed that bilingualism enhances inhibitory control, but the available evidence is equivocal. The authors evaluated several possible versions of the inhibition hypothesis by comparing monolinguals and bilinguals with regard to stop signal performance, inhibition of return, and the attentional blink. These three phenomena, it can be argued, tap into different aspects of inhibition. Monolinguals and bilinguals did not differ in stop signal reaction time and thus were comparable in terms of active-inhibitory efficiency. However, bilinguals showed no facilitation from spatial cues, showed a strong inhibition of return effect, and exhibited a more pronounced attentional blink. These results suggest that bilinguals do not differ from monolinguals in terms of active inhibition but have acquired a better ability to maintain action goals and to use them to bias goal-related information. Under some circumstances, this ability may indirectly lead to more pronounced reactive inhibition of irrelevant information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18315407     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  77 in total

1.  Effects of Marathi-Hindi bilingualism on neuropsychological performance.

Authors:  Rujvi Kamat; Manisha Ghate; Tamar H Gollan; Rachel Meyer; Florin Vaida; Robert K Heaton; Scott Letendre; Donald Franklin; Terry Alexander; Igor Grant; Sanjay Mehendale; Thomas D Marcotte
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 2.892

2.  Executive Function: Comparing Bilingual and Monolingual Iranian University Students.

Authors:  Toktam Kazemeini; Javad Salehi Fadardi
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-12

3.  The impact of bilingualism on working memory in pediatric epilepsy.

Authors:  Amy L Veenstra; Jeffrey D Riley; Lauren E Barrett; Michael G Muhonen; Mary Zupanc; Jonathan E Romain; Jack J Lin; Grace Mucci
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 2.937

4.  More evidence that a switch is not (always) a switch: Binning bilinguals reveals dissociations between task and language switching.

Authors:  Dorit Segal; Alena Stasenko; Tamar H Gollan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-11-05

5.  Selective and nonselective inhibition of competitors in picture naming.

Authors:  Zeshu Shao; Antje S Meyer; Ardi Roelofs
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-11

6.  Claiming evidence from non-evidence: a reply to Morton and Harper.

Authors:  Ellen Bialystok
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-07

7.  The bilingual advantage in novel word learning.

Authors:  Margarita Kaushanskaya; Viorica Marian
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-08

8.  Cognitive control in bilinguals: Advantages in Stimulus-Stimulus inhibition.

Authors:  Henrike K Blumenfeld; Viorica Marian
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2014-07

9.  Losing access to the native language while immersed in a second language: evidence for the role of inhibition in second-language learning.

Authors:  Jared A Linck; Judith F Kroll; Gretchen Sunderman
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-11-09

10.  Global-local and trail-making tasks by monolingual and bilingual children: beyond inhibition.

Authors:  Ellen Bialystok
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2010-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.