INTRODUCTION: In the year 2004 begin the technique of TOT for the treatment of the urinary incontinence of effort. In this study we compare the results with the published series of TOT and with the series of TVT carried out in our service. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have intervened to 171 patients, with a 57.7 year-old half age. In their 16%, besides carrying out TOT, we associate repair of anatomical pelvic defects. RESULTS: After a follow-up of 12 months and a mean of 14, 87% of the cases succeeded. Failures arose during the first three months of therapy. As complications they appeared post-operative retentions of less than 30 days in 2.7%, retentions to long in 4.8%, post-surgical hematomas in 1.3%, extrusion of the mesh in 2% and novo urgency in 2.3%. CONCLUSIONS: TOT is a technique it doesn't exempt of complications although their proportion is low and with some results that they are encouraging. It is about a surgical simple technique that as all technique, he/she has a learning curve. It requires a surgical (smaller than TVT) short time and it can be carried out in regime of bigger Ambulatory Surgery. The two techniques (TVT / TOT) have demonstrated to be similar as for cure rates although in the series of TOT it is slightly more baja. Las differences of the complications they are given in the percentages although always scarce.
INTRODUCTION: In the year 2004 begin the technique of TOT for the treatment of the urinary incontinence of effort. In this study we compare the results with the published series of TOT and with the series of TVT carried out in our service. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have intervened to 171 patients, with a 57.7 year-old half age. In their 16%, besides carrying out TOT, we associate repair of anatomical pelvic defects. RESULTS: After a follow-up of 12 months and a mean of 14, 87% of the cases succeeded. Failures arose during the first three months of therapy. As complications they appeared post-operative retentions of less than 30 days in 2.7%, retentions to long in 4.8%, post-surgical hematomas in 1.3%, extrusion of the mesh in 2% and novo urgency in 2.3%. CONCLUSIONS: TOT is a technique it doesn't exempt of complications although their proportion is low and with some results that they are encouraging. It is about a surgical simple technique that as all technique, he/she has a learning curve. It requires a surgical (smaller than TVT) short time and it can be carried out in regime of bigger Ambulatory Surgery. The two techniques (TVT / TOT) have demonstrated to be similar as for cure rates although in the series of TOT it is slightly more baja. Las differences of the complications they are given in the percentages although always scarce.