Literature DB >> 18314098

A computational model of spatial visualization capacity.

Don R Lyon1, Glenn Gunzelmann, Kevin A Gluck.   

Abstract

Visualizing spatial material is a cornerstone of human problem solving, but human visualization capacity is sharply limited. To investigate the sources of this limit, we developed a new task to measure visualization accuracy for verbally-described spatial paths (similar to street directions), and implemented a computational process model to perform it. In this model, developed within the Adaptive Control of Thought-Rational (ACT-R) architecture, visualization capacity is limited by three mechanisms. Two of these (associative interference and decay) are longstanding characteristics of ACT-R's declarative memory. A third (spatial interference) is a new mechanism motivated by spatial proximity effects in our data. We tested the model in two experiments, one with parameter-value fitting, and a replication without further fitting. Correspondence between model and data was close in both experiments, suggesting that the model may be useful for understanding why visualizing new, complex spatial material is so difficult.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18314098     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  3 in total

1.  The effects of spatial representation on memory for verbal navigation instructions.

Authors:  Immanuel Barshi; Alice F Healy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-01

2.  MAGELLAN: a cognitive map-based model of human wayfinding.

Authors:  Jeremy R Manning; Timothy F Lew; Ningcheng Li; Robert Sekuler; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-02-03

3.  Effects of social gaze on visual-spatial imagination.

Authors:  Heather Buchanan; Lucy Markson; Emma Bertrand; Sian Greaves; Reena Parmar; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.