Nathan W Hales1, Greg A Krempl, Jesus E Medina. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA. nathan-hales@ouhsc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of the fluorine 18 ((18)F)-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) scan in the evaluation of thyroid nodules in which the cytopathology of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies are classified as "indeterminate," ie, either follicular or Hürthle cell lesion. METHODS: At an academic medical center, we conducted a prospective pilot study of 15 patients with thyroid nodules in whom adequate FNA was diagnosed as indeterminate. All patients underwent a whole-body FDG-PET/CT scan followed by thyroidectomy. Preoperative FDG-PET/CT results and the histopathology of the surgical specimen were compared and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The FNA demonstrated follicular cells in 11 (73%) patients, Hürthle cells in 3 (20%) patients, and both types of cells in 1 (7%) patient. The histopathology of the surgical specimen revealed thyroid cancer in 7 (47%) patients. The FDG-PET/CT scan was positive in 8 patients; 4 (50%) patients were found to have cancer. The FDG-PET/CT scan was negative in 7 patients. Four of these patients had benign lesions and 3 had thyroid carcinoma. Thus, 4 (27%) patients had false-positive FDG-PET/CT scans and 3 (20%) patients had false-negative studies. The sensitivity of FDG-PET/CT to detect a malignant focus was 57% with a specificity of 50%. The positive predictive value was 50% and the negative predictive value was 57%. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study of patients with cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules, FDG-PET/CT was not a predictable indicator of benign or malignant disease. Although a larger series may elucidate a role for FDG-PET/CT, the relatively low predictability shown in this study should caution clinicians about using FDG-PET/CT to consider foregoing thyroidectomy for cytologically indeterminate nodules.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of the fluorine 18 ((18)F)-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) scan in the evaluation of thyroid nodules in which the cytopathology of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies are classified as "indeterminate," ie, either follicular or Hürthle cell lesion. METHODS: At an academic medical center, we conducted a prospective pilot study of 15 patients with thyroid nodules in whom adequate FNA was diagnosed as indeterminate. All patients underwent a whole-body FDG-PET/CT scan followed by thyroidectomy. Preoperative FDG-PET/CT results and the histopathology of the surgical specimen were compared and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The FNA demonstrated follicular cells in 11 (73%) patients, Hürthle cells in 3 (20%) patients, and both types of cells in 1 (7%) patient. The histopathology of the surgical specimen revealed thyroid cancer in 7 (47%) patients. The FDG-PET/CT scan was positive in 8 patients; 4 (50%) patients were found to have cancer. The FDG-PET/CT scan was negative in 7 patients. Four of these patients had benign lesions and 3 had thyroid carcinoma. Thus, 4 (27%) patients had false-positive FDG-PET/CT scans and 3 (20%) patients had false-negative studies. The sensitivity of FDG-PET/CT to detect a malignant focus was 57% with a specificity of 50%. The positive predictive value was 50% and the negative predictive value was 57%. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study of patients with cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules, FDG-PET/CT was not a predictable indicator of benign or malignant disease. Although a larger series may elucidate a role for FDG-PET/CT, the relatively low predictability shown in this study should caution clinicians about using FDG-PET/CT to consider foregoing thyroidectomy for cytologically indeterminate nodules.
Authors: Bryan R Haugen; Erik K Alexander; Keith C Bible; Gerard M Doherty; Susan J Mandel; Yuri E Nikiforov; Furio Pacini; Gregory W Randolph; Anna M Sawka; Martin Schlumberger; Kathryn G Schuff; Steven I Sherman; Julie Ann Sosa; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle; Leonard Wartofsky Journal: Thyroid Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Amber L Traugott; Farrokh Dehdashti; Kathryn Trinkaus; Mark Cohen; Elizabeth Fialkowski; Frank Quayle; Hameda Hussain; Rosa Davila; Lourdes Ylagan; Jeffrey F Moley Journal: World J Surg Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: N Muñoz Pérez; J M Villar del Moral; M A Muros Fuentes; M López de la Torre; J I Arcelus Martínez; P Becerra Massare; D Esteva Martínez; M Cañadas Garre; E Coll Del Rey; P Bueno Laraño; J A Ferrón Orihuela Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2013-04-28 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Thao T Nguyen; Natascha G E Lange; Anne L Nielsen; Anders Thomassen; Helle Døssing; Christian Godballe; Max Rohde Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2018-06-16 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: F Cornelis; M Silk; H Schoder; H Takaki; J C Durack; J P Erinjeri; C T Sofocleous; R H Siegelbaum; M Maybody; S B Solomon Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2014-08-09 Impact factor: 9.236