Literature DB >> 18313637

Contraceptive choice: how do oral contraceptive users differ from condom users and women who use no contraception?

Katherine M Krings1, Kristen A Matteson, Jenifer E Allsworth, Erin Mathias, Jeffrey F Peipert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether contraceptive choice is influenced by social and reproductive characteristics in a cohort of high-risk women. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from a randomized clinical trial of 542 women who were recruited from an urban population in New England. Of these participants, 422 women met inclusion criteria and had contraceptive information available for analysis. We evaluated sociodemographic and sexual history characteristics that were associated with oral contraceptive (OC) use, male condom use, or the use of no contraceptive method.
RESULTS: Women who reported OC use were more likely to have at least a high school education, to be white, and to have private insurance than were women who used no form of contraception. Women who used OCs were more likely to have private insurance than women who used male condoms. Finally, although having a new sexual partner in the past 6 months and having multiple sexual partners in the preceding month were associated with contraceptive choice, other reproductive characteristics were not.
CONCLUSION: Among this cohort of women at high-risk for sexually transmitted diseases and unintended pregnancy, sociodemographic characteristics that included education level, race, insurance status, and sexual history influenced contraceptive choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18313637      PMCID: PMC4229032          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.12.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

1.  Race, adolescent contraceptive choice, and pregnancy at presentation to a family planning clinic.

Authors:  Tina Raine; Cynthia Harper; Maarit Paukku; Philip Darney
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Explaining recent declines in adolescent pregnancy in the United States: the contribution of abstinence and improved contraceptive use.

Authors:  John S Santelli; Laura Duberstein Lindberg; Lawrence B Finer; Susheela Singh
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Unintended pregnancy in the United States.

Authors:  S K Henshaw
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb

4.  Trends in contraceptive use in the United States: 1982-1995.

Authors:  L J Piccinino; W D Mosher
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb

5.  Design of a stage-matched intervention trial to increase dual method contraceptive use (Project PROTECT).

Authors:  Jeffrey Peipert; Colleen A Redding; Jeffrey Blume; Jenifer E Allsworth; Karen Iannuccillo; Faye Lozowski; Kenneth Mayer; Patricia J Morokoff; Joseph S Rossi
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Determinants of contraceptive method among young women at risk for unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  Tina Raine; Alexandra M Minnis; Nancy S Padian
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Contraceptive use among U.S. women having abortions in 2000-2001.

Authors:  Rachel K Jones; Jacqueline E Darroch; Stanley K Henshaw
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec
  7 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Contraceptive Care in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Emmanuelle B Yecies; Colleen P Judge-Golden; Lisa Callegari; Sonya Borrero
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 1.303

Review 2.  Disparities in family planning.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Maria Isabel Rodriguez; Kira Levy; Sonya Borrero; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Racial and ethnic disparities in contraceptive knowledge among women veterans in the ECUUN study.

Authors:  Elian Rosenfeld; Lisa S Callegari; Florentina E Sileanu; Xinhua Zhao; E Bimla Schwarz; Maria K Mor; Sonya Borrero
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Contraceptive Desert? Black-White Differences in Characteristics of Nearby Pharmacies.

Authors:  Jennifer S Barber; Elizabeth Ela; Heather Gatny; Yasamin Kusunoki; Souhiela Fakih; Peter Batra; Karen Farris
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2019-02-20

5.  Contraceptive service needs of women with young children presenting for pediatric care.

Authors:  Krishna K Upadhya; Anne E Burke; Arik V Marcell; Kamila Mistry; Tina L Cheng
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Exploring young adults' contraceptive knowledge and attitudes: disparities by race/ethnicity and age.

Authors:  Amaranta D Craig; Christine Dehlendorf; Sonya Borrero; Cynthia C Harper; Corinne H Rocca
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2014-04-13

7.  The breast cancer paradox: A systematic review of the association between area-level deprivation and breast cancer screening uptake in Europe.

Authors:  Dinah Smith; Katie Thomson; Clare Bambra; Adam Todd
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Associations between hormonal contraception use, sociodemographic factors and mental health: a nationwide, register-based, matched case-control study.

Authors:  Elena Toffol; Anna But; Oskari Heikinheimo; Antti Latvala; Timo Partonen; Jari Haukka
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Population-level indicators associated with hormonal contraception use: a register-based matched case-control study.

Authors:  Elena Toffol; Oskari Heikinheimo; Anna But; Antti Latvala; Timo Partonen; Jari Haukka
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 3.295

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.