Literature DB >> 18313509

Review of surface steam sterilization for validation purposes.

Joost van Doornmalen1, Klaas Kopinga.   

Abstract

Sterilization is an essential step in the process of producing sterile medical devices. To guarantee sterility, the process of sterilization must be validated. Because there is no direct way to measure sterility, the techniques applied to validate the sterilization process are based on statistical principles. Steam sterilization is the most frequently applied sterilization method worldwide and can be validated either by indicators (chemical or biological) or physical measurements. The steam sterilization conditions are described in the literature. Starting from these conditions, criteria for the validation of steam sterilization are derived and can be described in terms of physical parameters. Physical validation of steam sterilization appears to be an adequate and efficient validation method that could be considered as an alternative for indicator validation. Moreover, physical validation can be used for effective troubleshooting in steam sterilizing processes.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18313509     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  4 in total

1.  The stability mechanisms of an injectable calcium phosphate ceramic suspension.

Authors:  Ahmed Fatimi; Jean-François Tassin; Monique A V Axelos; Pierre Weiss
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  False positive results of Bowie and Dick type test used for hospital steam sterilizer with slower come-up ramps: A case study.

Authors:  Paulo Roberto Laranjeira; Jeane Aparecida Gonzalez Bronzatti; Camila Quartim de Moraes Bruna; Rafael Queiroz de Souza; Kazuko Uchikawa Graziano; Viktoriya Lusignan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Developing the use of quality indicators in sterilization practices.

Authors:  H Jabbari; H Alikhah; N Sahebkaram Alamdari; M Naghavi Behzad; E Mehrabi; L Borzui; F Bakhshian
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 1.429

4.  Assessment of laparoscopic instrument reprocessing in rural India: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Daniel Robertson; Jesudian Gnanaraj; Linda Wauben; Jan Huijs; Vasanth Mark Samuel; Jenny Dankelman; Tim Horeman-Franse
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 4.887

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.