Literature DB >> 18311507

Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate in breast cancer patients with a clinically negative axillary nodal status at presentation.

P Gimbergues1, C Abrial, X Durando, G Le Bouedec, F Cachin, F Penault-Llorca, M A Mouret-Reynier, F Kwiatkowski, J Maublant, A Tchirkov, J Dauplat.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is widely used in order to enable a conservative surgery. In patients treated with NAC, the use of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy, which is a good predictor of the axillary nodal status in previously untreated patients, is still discussed. The aim of our study was to determine clinicopathological factors that may influence the accuracy of SLN biopsy after NAC.
METHODS: Between March 2001 and December 2006, 129 patients with infiltrating breast carcinoma were studied prospectively. Preoperatively, all of them underwent NAC. At surgery, SLN biopsy followed by axillary lymph node (ALN) dissection was performed. Lymphatic mapping was done using the isotope method.
RESULTS: The SLN identification rate was 93.8% (121/129). Fifty-six out of the 121 successfully mapped patients had positive ALN. Eight out of these 56 patients had tumor-free SLN (false-negative rate of 14.3%). The false-negative rate was correlated with larger tumor size (T1-T2 versus T3; P = 0.045) and positive clinical nodal status (N0 versus N1-N2; P = 0.003) before NAC. In particular, the false-negative rate was 0% (0/29) in N0 patients and 29.6% (8/27) in N1-N2 patients. Clinical and pathological responses to NAC did not influence the accuracy of SLN biopsy.
CONCLUSION: Our results show that clinical nodal status is the main clinicopathological factor influencing the false-negative rate of SLN biopsy after NAC for breast cancer. SLN biopsy after NAC can predict the ALN status with a high accuracy in patients who are clinically lymph node negative at presentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18311507     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-007-9759-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  14 in total

1.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy does not apply to all axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Wen-Kai Ge; Ben Yang; Wen-Shu Zuo; Gang Zheng; Ying-Qi Dai; Chao Han; Li Yang; Mei-Zhu Zheng
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.500

2.  Outcomes of Sentinel Node Biopsy for Women with Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Data.

Authors:  Shi-Qian Lin; Nguyen-Phong Vo; Yu-Chun Yen; Ka-Wai Tam
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Breast cancer: Actual methods of treatment and future trends.

Authors:  Paweł Murawa; Dawid Murawa; Beata Adamczyk; Karol Połom
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-01-23

Review 4.  Advantage of sentinel lymph node biopsy before neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Hirotaka Iwase; Yutaka Yamamoto; Teru Kawasoe; Mutsuko Ibusuki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  The false-negative rate of sentinel node biopsy in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah Pesek; Taka Ashikaga; Lars Erik Krag; David Krag
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer patients following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis about head to head comparison of cN0 and cN + patients.

Authors:  Leili Zarifmahmoudi; Atena Aghaee; Giorgio Treglia; Ramin Sadeghi
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.239

7.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy alone after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with initial cytology-proven axillary node metastasis.

Authors:  Ji Young Kim; Min Kuk Kim; Jeong Eon Lee; Yongsik Jung; Soo Youn Bae; Se Kyung Lee; Won Ho Kil; Seok Won Kim; Ku Sang Kim; Seok Jin Nam; Sehwan Han
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.588

Review 8.  Targeting and limiting surgery for patients with node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Abigail S Caudle; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 8.775

9.  A mini-review on factors and countermeasures associated with false-negative sentinel lymph node biopsies in breast cancer.

Authors:  Chao Han; Li Yang; Wenshu Zuo
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 10.  The sentinel node in breast cancer.

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.