Literature DB >> 18311326

Health science students and their learning environment: a comparison of perceptions of on-site, remote-site, and traditional classroom students.

P Elison-Bowers1, Chareen Snelson, Mario Casa de Calvo, Heather Thompson.   

Abstract

This study compared the responses of on-site, remote-site, and traditional classroom students on measures of student/teacher interaction, course structure, physical learning environment, and overall course enjoyment/satisfaction. The sample population consisted of students taking undergraduate courses in medical terminology at two western colleges. The survey instrument was derived from Thomerson's questionnaire, which included closed- and open-ended questions assessing perceptions of students toward their courses. Controlling for grade expectations, results revealed no significant differences among the on-site, remote-site, and traditional classroom students in any of the four cluster domains. However, a nonsignificant (and continuing) trend suggested that students preferred the traditional classroom environment. When results were controlled for age, significant differences emerged between traditional and nontraditional students on measures of student/teacher interaction, physical learning environment, and overall enjoyment/satisfaction, as nontraditional students exhibited higher scores. Students' responses to open-ended questions indicated they enjoyed the convenience of online instruction, but reported finding frustration with technology itself.

Keywords:  adult learner; distance education; interactive video

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18311326      PMCID: PMC2242346     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag        ISSN: 1559-4122


  8 in total

1.  Interdisciplinary and distance education in the Delta: the Delta Health Education Partnership.

Authors:  Phyllis Skorga
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.338

Review 2.  Continuing education in nursing: a concept analysis.

Authors:  Lorraine Gallagher
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 3.  The impact of the national information infrastructure on distance education and the changing role of the nurse.

Authors:  E G Gomez; H Ehrenberger; P J Murray; C R King
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 4.  Continuing medical education. Global health, global learning.

Authors:  D Davis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-01-31

5.  Grants to shape the health care workforce: the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation experience.

Authors:  S L Isaacs; L G Sandy; S A Schroeder
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Nurses' CE options expand with distance learning.

Authors:  K Canavan
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.220

7.  The challenge of meeting patients' needs with a national nursing informatics agenda.

Authors:  C A Gassert
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Multiple role women: the real world of the mature RN learner.

Authors:  C P Green
Journal:  J Nurs Educ       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 1.726

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Perceptions of pharmacy students, faculty members, and administrators on the use of technology in the classroom.

Authors:  Margarita V DiVall; Mary S Hayney; Wallace Marsh; Michael W Neville; Stephen O'Barr; Erin D Sheets; Larry D Calhoun
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Developing a fully online course for senior medical students.

Authors:  Chris Chapman; Casey B White; Cary Engleberg; Joseph C Fantone; Sandro K Cinti
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2011-05-06

3.  Innovations in nutrition education and global health: the Bangalore Boston nutrition collaborative.

Authors:  Rebecca Kuriyan; Jeffrey K Griffiths; Julia L Finkelstein; Tinku Thomas; Tony Raj; Ronald J Bosch; Anura V Kurpad; Christopher Duggan
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.463

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.