Literature DB >> 18311316

On the evolution of brain size in relation to migratory behaviour in birds.

Vladimir V Pravosudov1, Kirsten Sanford, Thomas P Hahn.   

Abstract

Migratory birds appear to have relatively smaller brain size compared to sedentary species. It has been hypothesized that initial differences in brain size underlying behavioural flexibility drove the evolution of migratory behaviour; birds with relatively large brains evolved sedentary habits and those with relatively small brains evolved migratory behaviour (migratory precursor hypothesis). Alternative hypotheses suggest that changes in brain size might follow different behavioural strategies and that sedentary species might have evolved larger brains because of differences in selection pressures on brain size in migratory and nonmigratory species. Here we present the first evidence arguing against the migratory precursor hypothesis. We compared relative brain volume of three subspecies of the white-crowned sparrow: sedentary Zonotrichia leucophrys nuttalli and migratory Z. l. gambelii and Z. l. oriantha. Within the five subspecies of the white-crowned sparrow, only Z. l. nuttalli is strictly sedentary. The sedentary behaviour of Z. l. nuttalli is probably a derived trait, because Z. l. nuttalli appears to be the most recent subspecies and because all species ancestral to Zonotrichia as well as all older subspecies of Z. leucophrys are migratory. Compared to migratory Z. l. gambelii and Z. l. oriantha, we found that sedentary Z. l. nuttalli had a significantly larger relative brain volume, suggesting that the larger brain of Z. l. nuttalli evolved after a switch to sedentary behaviour. Thus, in this group, brain size does not appear to be a precursor to the evolution of migratory or sedentary behaviour but rather an evolutionary consequence of a change in migratory strategy.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 18311316      PMCID: PMC1865118          DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  10 in total

1.  Hippocampal volume does not change seasonally in a non food-storing songbird.

Authors:  D W Lee; G T Smith; A D Tramontin; K K Soma; E A Brenowitz; N S Clayton
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-07-03       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Changes in spatial memory mediated by experimental variation in food supply do not affect hippocampal anatomy in mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli).

Authors:  V V Pravosudov; P Lavenex; N S Clayton
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  2002-05

3.  Dominance-related changes in spatial memory are associated with changes in hippocampal cell proliferation rates in mountain chickadees.

Authors:  Vladimir V Pravosudov; Alicja Omanska
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  2005-01

4.  Prolonged moderate elevation of corticosterone does not affect hippocampal anatomy or cell proliferation rates in mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli).

Authors:  Vladimir V Pravosudov; Alicja Omanska
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  2005-01

Review 5.  Brains, innovations and evolution in birds and primates.

Authors:  Louis Lefebvre; Simon M Reader; Daniel Sol
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.808

6.  Big brains, enhanced cognition, and response of birds to novel environments.

Authors:  Daniel Sol; Richard P Duncan; Tim M Blackburn; Phillip Cassey; Louis Lefebvre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Brain size, innovative propensity and migratory behaviour in temperate Palaearctic birds.

Authors:  Daniel Sol; Louis Lefebvre; J Domingo Rodríguez-Teijeiro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The relationship between migratory behaviour, memory and the hippocampus: an intraspecific comparison.

Authors:  Vladimir V Pravosudov; Alexander S Kitaysky; Alicja Omanska
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology and its prediction.

Authors:  H J Gundersen; E B Jensen
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 1.758

10.  A test of the adaptive specialization hypothesis: population differences in caching, memory, and the hippocampus in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapilla).

Authors:  Vladimir V Pravosudov; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.912

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Long-distance migrating species of birds travel in larger groups.

Authors:  Guy Beauchamp
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Problems with using comparative analyses of avian brain size to test hypotheses of cognitive evolution.

Authors:  Rebecca Hooper; Becky Brett; Alex Thornton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Evolutionary divergence in brain size between migratory and resident birds.

Authors:  Daniel Sol; Núria Garcia; Andrew Iwaniuk; Katie Davis; Andrew Meade; W Alice Boyle; Tamás Székely
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Light enough to travel: migratory bats have smaller brains, but not larger hippocampi, than sedentary species.

Authors:  Liam P McGuire; John M Ratcliffe
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 3.703

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.