Literature DB >> 18310747

Comparison of the information in arthroplasty registers from different countries.

G Labek1, C I Stoica, N Böhler.   

Abstract

This article considers some of the problems of the interpretation of information from other national arthroplasty registers when setting up a new register. In order for the most useful information to be available from registers much international co-operation is required between all those responsible for the design of registers as well as those who gather, assess and publish the data.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18310747     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B3.19556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  10 in total

1.  The outcome of the cementless tapered SL-Plus stem: an analysis of arthroplasty register data.

Authors:  Gerold Labek; Simon Kovac; Vesna Levasic; Wolfgang Janda; Luigi Zagra
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Revision rate of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: comparison of published literature and arthroplasty register data.

Authors:  Reinhard Schuh; Daniel Neumann; Rauend Rauf; Jochen Hofstaetter; Nikolaus Boehler; Gerold Labek
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Organisation, data evaluation, interpretation and effect of arthroplasty register data on the outcome in terms of revision rate in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gerold Labek; Wolfgang Janda; Mark Agreiter; Reinhard Schuh; Nikolaus Böhler
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  International survey of primary and revision total knee replacement.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Kevin L Ong; Edmund Lau; Marcel Widmer; Milka Maravic; Enrique Gómez-Barrena; Maria de Fátima de Pina; Valerio Manno; Marina Torre; William L Walter; Richard de Steiger; Rudolph G T Geesink; Mikko Peltola; Christoph Röder
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  [Revision rates in journal publications on joint prostheses with noticeably high failure rates in register data sets].

Authors:  G Labek; S Todorov; A Lübbeke-Wolff; B Haderer; S Krivanek
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  Validity of published outcome data concerning Anatomic Graduated Component total knee arthroplasty: a structured literature review including arthroplasty register data.

Authors:  Reinhard Schuh; Gerald Dorninger; Mark Agreiter; Nikolaus Boehler; Gerold Labek
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  The painful knee after TKA: a diagnostic algorithm for failure analysis.

Authors:  S Hofmann; G Seitlinger; O Djahani; M Pietsch
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  The First Report of the International Cartilage Regeneration and Joint Preservation Society's Global Registry.

Authors:  Leela C Biant; Caitlin W Conley; Michael J McNicholas
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 9.  Outcome and reproducibility of data concerning the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a structured literature review including arthroplasty registry data.

Authors:  Gerold Labek; Kathrin Sekyra; Wolfram Pawelka; Wolfgang Janda; Bernd Stöckl
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 10.  Outcome of the cementless Taperloc stem: a comprehensive literature review including arthroplasty register data.

Authors:  Gerold Labek; Stefan Frischhut; Rainer Schlichtherle; Alexandra Williams; Martin Thaler
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.717

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.