Literature DB >> 18310704

Predicting scoliosis progression from skeletal maturity: a simplified classification during adolescence.

James O Sanders1, Joseph G Khoury, Shyam Kishan, Richard H Browne, James F Mooney, Kali D Arnold, Sharon J McConnell, Jeanne A Bauman, David N Finegold.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both the Tanner-Whitehouse-III RUS score, which is based on the radiographic appearance of the epiphyses of the distal part of the radius, the distal part of the ulna, and small bones of the hand, and the digital skeletal age skeletal maturity scoring system, which is based on just the metacarpals and phalanges, correlate highly with the curve acceleration phase in girls with idiopathic scoliosis. However, these systems require an atlas and access to the scoring system, making their use impractical in a busy clinical setting. We sought to develop a simplified system that would correlate highly with scoliosis behavior but that would also be rapid and reliable for clinical practice.
METHODS: A simplified staging system involving the use of the Tanner-Whitehouse-III descriptors was developed. It was tested for intraobserver and interobserver reliability by six individuals on thirty skeletal age radiographs. The system was compared with the timing of the curve acceleration phase in a cohort of twenty-two girls with idiopathic scoliosis.
RESULTS: The average intraobserver unweighted kappa value was 0.88, and the average weighted kappa value was 0.96. The percentage of exact matches between readings for each rater was 89%, and 100% of the differences were within one unit. The average interobserver unweighted kappa value was 0.71, and the average weighted kappa value was 0.89. The percentage of exact matches between two reviewers was 71%, and 97% of the interobserver differences were within one stage or matched. The agreement was highest between the most experienced raters. Interobserver reliability was not improved by the use of a classification-specific atlas. The correlation of the staging system with the curve acceleration phase was 0.91.
CONCLUSIONS: The simplified skeletal maturity scoring system is reliable and correlates more strongly with the behavior of idiopathic scoliosis than the Risser sign or Greulich and Pyle skeletal ages do. The system has a modest learning curve but is easily used in a clinical setting and, in conjunction with curve type and magnitude, appears to be strongly prognostic of future scoliosis curve behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18310704     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  60 in total

1.  In brief: The Risser classification: a classic tool for the clinician treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jacques H Hacquebord; Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  When Should We Wean Bracing for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

Authors:  Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Prudence Wing Hang Cheung; Keith Dip-Kei Luk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Design of the Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial (BrAIST).

Authors:  Stuart L Weinstein; Lori A Dolan; James G Wright; Matthew B Dobbs
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Adult lumbar scoliosis: underreported on lumbar MR scans.

Authors:  Z Anwar; E Zan; S K Gujar; D M Sciubba; L H Riley; Z L Gokaslan; D M Yousem
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  The "Risser+" grade: a new grading system to classify skeletal maturity in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  M J Troy; P E Miller; N Price; V Talwalkar; F Zaina; S Donzelli; S Negrini; M T Hresko
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  A quantitative method for the radiological assessment of skeletal maturity using the distal femur.

Authors:  D M Knapik; J O Sanders; A Gilmore; D R Weber; D R Cooperman; R W Liu
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  [Scoliosis: the bent spine].

Authors:  R Radl; M Maafe; S Ziegler
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Scoliosis in patients with Chiari malformation type I.

Authors:  Mohammad Hassan A Noureldine; Nir Shimony; George I Jallo; Mari L Groves
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 9.  Progression or not progression? How to deal with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis during puberty.

Authors:  Alain Dimeglio; Federico Canavese
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 1.548

10.  Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Stuart L Weinstein; Lori A Dolan; James G Wright; Matthew B Dobbs
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.