Literature DB >> 18310683

Humeral hemiarthroplasty with biologic resurfacing of the glenoid for glenohumeral arthritis. Surgical technique.

Sumant G Krishnan1, John R Reineck, Robert J Nowinski, Donnis Harrison, Wayne Z Burkhead.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biologic glenoid resurfacing was developed in 1988 as an alternative to total shoulder arthroplasty in selected (usually younger) patients with primary, posttraumatic, or postreconstructive glenohumeral arthritis. A variety of biologic surfaces, including anterior capsule, autogenous fascia lata, and Achilles tendon allograft, have been combined with a humeral hemiarthroplasty.
METHODS: From November 1988 to November 2003, thirty-four patients (thirty-six shoulders) who were managed with biologic glenoid resurfacing and humeral head replacement either with cement (ten shoulders) or without cement (twenty-six shoulders) were followed prospectively. The study group included thirty men and four women with an average age of fifty-one years. The diagnoses included primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (eighteen shoulders), postreconstructive arthritis (twelve), posttraumatic arthritis (five), and osteonecrosis (one). Anterior capsule was used for seven shoulders, autogenous fascia lata for eleven, and Achilles tendon allograft for eighteen. All shoulders were assessed clinically and with serial radiographs.
RESULTS: The mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 39 points preoperatively and 91 points at the time of the most recent follow-up. According to Neer's criteria, the result was excellent for eighteen shoulders, satisfactory for thirteen, and unsatisfactory for five. Glenoid erosion averaged 7.2 mm and appeared to stabilize at five years. There were no revisions for humeral component loosening. Complications included infection (two patients), instability (three patients), brachial plexitis (one patient), and deep-vein thrombosis (one patient). Factors that appeared to be associated with unsatisfactory results were the use of capsular tissue as the resurfacing material and infection.
CONCLUSIONS: Biologic resurfacing of the glenoid can provide pain relief similar to total shoulder arthroplasty. It allows selected younger patients to maintain an active lifestyle, including weight-lifting and manual work, without the risk of polyethylene wear. On the basis of this and previous reviews, we currently recommend Achilles tendon allograft as the preferred resurfacing material when this option is chosen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18310683     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  4 in total

Review 1.  Foreign body reaction to acellular dermal matrix allograft in biologic glenoid resurfacing.

Authors:  Surena Namdari; Christopher Melnic; G Russell Huffman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Case reports: two cases of glenohumeral chondrolysis after intraarticular pain pumps.

Authors:  Okechukwu A Anakwenze; Harish Hosalkar; G Russell Huffman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The Mature Athlete's Shoulder.

Authors:  John M Tokish
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.843

4.  Glenohumeral kinematics after soft tissue interposition graft and glenoid reaming: A cadaveric study.

Authors:  Nickolas G Garbis; Alexander E Weber; Elizabeth F Shewman; Brian J Cole; Anthony A Romeo; Nikhil N Verma
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.251

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.