Literature DB >> 18310199

Safety and immunogenicity of concurrent administration of live attenuated influenza vaccine with measles-mumps-rubella and varicella vaccines to infants 12 to 15 months of age.

Terry Nolan1, David I Bernstein, Stan L Block, Milo Hilty, Harry L Keyserling, Colin Marchant, Helen Marshall, Peter Richmond, Ram Yogev, Julie Cordova, Iksung Cho, Paul M Mendelman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of live attenuated influenza vaccine administered concurrently with measles-mumps-rubella vaccine and varicella vaccine to healthy children 12 to 15 months of age.
METHODS: Children were assigned randomly to receive (1) measles-mumps-rubella vaccine, varicella vaccine, and intranasal placebo on day 0, followed by 1 dose of live attenuated influenza vaccine on days 42 and 72; (2) measles-mumps-rubella, varicella, and live attenuated influenza vaccines on day 0, followed by a second dose of live attenuated influenza vaccine on day 42 and intranasally administered placebo on day 72; or (3) 1 dose of live attenuated influenza vaccine on days 0 and 42, followed by measles-mumps-rubella and varicella vaccines on day 72. Serum samples were collected before vaccination on days 0, 42, and 72. Reactogenicity events and adverse events were collected through day 41 after concurrent vaccinations and through day 10 after administration of live attenuated influenza vaccine or placebo alone.
RESULTS: Among 1245 (99.5%) evaluable children, seroresponse rates and geometric mean titers for measles-mumps-rubella vaccine and varicella vaccine were similar with concurrent administration of live attenuated influenza vaccine or placebo (seroresponse rates of > or = 96% for measles-mumps-rubella vaccine and > or = 82% for varicella vaccine in both groups). Hemagglutinin-inhibiting antibody geometric mean titers and seroconversion rates to influenza strains in live attenuated influenza virus vaccine were similar after the vaccine was administered alone (seroconversion rates of 98%, 92%, and 44% for H3, B, and H1 strains, respectively) or with measles-mumps-rubella and varicella vaccines (seroconversion rates of 98%, 96%, and 43%). The incidences of reactogenicity events and adverse events were similar among treatment groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent administration of live attenuated influenza vaccine with measles-mumps-rubella vaccine and varicella vaccine provided equivalent immunogenicity, compared with separate administration, and was well tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18310199     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2007-1064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  16 in total

Review 1.  Vaccines for post-exposure prophylaxis against varicella (chickenpox) in children and adults.

Authors:  Kristine Macartney; Anita Heywood; Peter McIntyre
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-06-23

Review 2.  Live attenuated influenza vaccine (FluMist®; Fluenz™): a review of its use in the prevention of seasonal influenza in children and adults.

Authors:  Natalie J Carter; Monique P Curran
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Factors That Influence the Immune Response to Vaccination.

Authors:  Petra Zimmermann; Nigel Curtis
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Recommendations on the use of live, attenuated influenza vaccine (FluMist®): Supplemental Statement on Seasonal Influenza Vaccine for 2011-2012 An Advisory Committee Statement (ACS) National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI).

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2011-11-30

5.  STATEMENT ON SEASONAL INFLUENZA VACCINE FOR 2012-2013: An Advisory Committee Statement (ACS) National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI).

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2012-08-01

6.  Live attenuated influenza vaccine (Fluenz™): a guide to its use in the prevention of seasonal influenza in children in the EU.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott; Natalie J Carter; Monique P Curran
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 7.  Primary versus secondary failure after varicella vaccination: implications for interval between 2 doses.

Authors:  Paolo Bonanni; Anne Gershon; Michael Gershon; Andrea Kulcsár; Vassiliki Papaevangelou; Bernard Rentier; Catherine Sadzot-Delvaux; Vytautas Usonis; Timo Vesikari; Catherine Weil-Olivier; Peter de Winter; Peter Wutzler
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Prevention of measles, mumps and rubella: 40 years of global experience with M-M-RII.

Authors:  Barbara J Kuter; Gary S Marshall; Jaime Fergie; Elvira Schmidt; Manjiri Pawaskar
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Vaccination of children with a live-attenuated, intranasal influenza vaccine - analysis and evaluation through a Health Technology Assessment.

Authors:  Frank Andersohn; Reinhard Bornemann; Oliver Damm; Martin Frank; Thomas Mittendorf; Ulrike Theidel
Journal:  GMS Health Technol Assess       Date:  2014-10-30

10.  Immunogenicity of a quadrivalent Ann Arbor strain live attenuated influenza vaccine delivered using a blow-fill-seal device in adults: a randomized, active-controlled study*.

Authors:  Eric A Sheldon; Robert Jeanfreau; Joseph A Sliman; Supoat Charenkavanich; Matthew D Rousculp; Filip Dubovsky; Raburn M Mallory
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 4.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.