Literature DB >> 18310099

Results of a European survey on patient doses in paediatric radiology.

K Smans1, E Vaño, R Sanchez, F W Schultz, J Zoetelief, T Kiljunen, C Maccia, H Järvinen, R Bly, A Kosunen, K Faulkner, H Bosmans.   

Abstract

Paediatric patients represent a very specific group within the radiology department. Compared to adult patients, they are more sensitive to radiation. As they are sometimes submitted to several radiology procedures, dose and image quality should be well balanced. Nowadays, only a few centres specialize in paediatric imaging, and knowledge of paediatric patient doses is, therefore, very scattered. The effect of the introduction of digital technology on paediatric patient doses remains largely undocumented. Data collected in the present survey illustrate that there is a clear need for standardisation in this domain. The proposal of a European diagnostic reference level (DRL) is quite difficult. Preliminary DRLs, based on typically 5-7 radiology centres per examination are proposed. The 'effective dose' may or may not be a very rigorous parameter, but it still remains useful nowadays to calculate a parameter that summarises the possible radiation-induced detriment to these young patients. However, conversion factors for calculation of the effective dose should be harmonised. Future studies should include an image quality evaluation study, using criteria that account for digital equipment. Data collection would be straightforward and could be performed in a systematic and automatic way if DICOM headers of digital images would include appropriate as well as relevant information for the particular case of paediatric examinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18310099     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncn031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  5 in total

1.  Postnatal imaging of prenatally detected hydronephrosis-when is voiding cystourethrogram necessary?

Authors:  Sofia Visuri; Reetta Kivisaari; Timo Jahnukainen; Seppo Taskinen
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  Evaluation of pediatric VCUG at an academic children's hospital: is the radiographic scout image necessary?

Authors:  Jason G Domina; Ramon Sanchez; Indu R Meesa; Emmanuel Christodoulou
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-12-14

3.  Consideration of diagnostic reference levels for pediatric chest X-ray examinations.

Authors:  Yasuki Asada; Takuma Ichikawa
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2019-08-31

4.  Gonad shielding in paediatric pelvic radiography: disadvantages prevail over benefit.

Authors:  Marij J Frantzen; Simon Robben; Alida A Postma; Johannes Zoetelief; Joachim E Wildberger; Gerrit J Kemerink
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2011-09-25

5.  Diagnostic reference levels in paediatric fluoroscopy: how does a secondary referral centre compare with 2018 European guidelines?

Authors:  Emily Ashworth; Liam Woods; J Valmai Cook
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.629

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.