Literature DB >> 18308496

Assessment of image quality of 64-row Dual Source versus Single Source CT coronary angiography on heart rate: a phantom study.

R Dikkers1, M J W Greuter, W Kristanto, P M A van Ooijen, P E Sijens, T P Willems, M Oudkerk.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the influence of temporal resolution on image quality of computed tomographic (CT) coronary angiography by comparing 64-row Dual Source CT (DSCT) and Single Source CT (SSCT) at different heart rates.
METHODS: An anthropomorphic moving heart phantom was scanned at rest, and at 50 beats per minute (bpm) up to 110 bpm, with intervals of 10 bpm. 3D volume rendered images and curved multi-planar reconstructions (MPRs) were acquired and image quality of the coronary arteries was rated on a 5-points scale (1=poor image quality with many artefacts, 5=excellent image quality) for each heart rate and each scanner by 3 observers. Paired sample t-test and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test were used to assess clinically relevant differences between both modalities.
RESULTS: The mean image quality scores at 70, 100 and 110 bpm were significantly higher for DSCT compared to SSCT. The overall mean image quality scores for DSCT (4.2+/-0.6) and SSCT (3.0+/-1.1) also differed significantly (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: These initial results show a clinically relevant overall higher image quality for DSCT compared to SSCT, especially at heart rates of 70, 100 and 110 bpm. With its comparatively high image quality and low radiation dose, DSCT appears to be the method of choice in CT coronary angiography at heart rates above 70 bpm.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18308496     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  6 in total

Review 1.  Coronary CT angiography: Diagnostic value and clinical challenges.

Authors:  Akmal Sabarudin; Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-26

2.  Dual-source CT coronary angiography without heart rate or rhythm control in comparison with conventional coronary angiography.

Authors:  Xiang Ming Fang; Hong Wei Chen; Xiao Yun Hu; Jian Bao; Yin Chen; Zhen Yu Yang; Orla Buckley; Xiao Qing Wu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Radiation dose considerations by intra-individual Monte Carlo simulations in dual source spiral coronary computed tomography angiography with electrocardiogram-triggered tube current modulation and adaptive pitch.

Authors:  Matthias S May; Paul Deak; Axel Kuettner; Michael M Lell; Wolfgang Wuest; Michael Scharf; Andrea K Keller; Lothar Häberle; Stephan Achenbach; Martin Seltmann; Michael Uder; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  A Magnetically Controlled Soft Microrobot Steering a Guidewire in a Three-Dimensional Phantom Vascular Network.

Authors:  Sungwoong Jeon; Ali Kafash Hoshiar; Kangho Kim; Seungmin Lee; Eunhee Kim; Sunkey Lee; Jin-Young Kim; Bradley J Nelson; Hyo-Jeong Cha; Byung-Ju Yi; Hongsoo Choi
Journal:  Soft Robot       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 8.071

5.  Incidental breast lesions detected on CT: what is their significance?

Authors:  P Moyle; L Sonoda; P Britton; R Sinnatamby
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Stable patients with suspected myocardial ischemia: comparison of machine-learning computed tomography-based fractional flow reserve and stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to detect myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  Dirk Lossnitzer; Selina Klenantz; Florian Andre; Johannes Goerich; U Joseph Schoepf; Kyle L Pazzo; Andre Sommer; Matthias Brado; Friedemann Gückel; Roman Sokiranski; Tobias Becher; Ibrahim Akin; Sebastian J Buss; Stefan Baumann
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 2.298

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.